Mauretania, or Maurusia as it was called by Greek writers, signified
the land of the Mauri, a term still retained in the modern name of
Moors (q.v.). The origin and ethnical affinities of the race are
uncertain; but it is probable that all the inhabitants of this
northern tract of Africa were kindred races belonging to the great
Berber family, possibly with an intermingled fair-skinned race from
Europe (see Tissot, _Géographie comparée de la province romaine
d'Afrique_, i. 400 seq.; also BERBERS). They first appear in history
at the time of the Jugurthine War (110-106 B.C.), when Mauretania was
under the government of Bocchus and seems to have been recognized as
organized state (Sallust, _Jugurtha_, 19). To this Bocchus was given,
after the war, the western part of Jugurtha's kingdom of Numidia,
perhaps as far east as Saldae (Bougie). Sixty years later, at the time
of the dictator Caesar, we find two Mauretanian kingdoms, one to the
west of the river Mulucha under Bogud, and the other to the east under
a Bocchus; as to the date or cause of the division we are ignorant.
Both these kings took Caesar's part in the civil wars, and had their
territory enlarged by him (Appian, B.C. 4, 54). In 25 B.C., after
their deaths, Augustus gave the two kingdoms to Juba II. of Numidia
(see under JUBA), with the river Ampsaga as the eastern frontier
(Plin. 5. 22; Ptol. 4. 3. 1). Juba and his son Ptolemaeus after him
reigned till A.D. 40, when the latter was put to death by Caligula,
and shortly afterwards Claudius incorporated the kingdom into the
Roman state as two provinces, viz. Mauretania Tingitana to the west
of the Mulucha and M. Caesariensis to the east of that river, the
latter taking its name from the city Caesarea (formerly Iol), which
Juba had thus named and adopted as his capital. Thus the dividing line
between the two provinces was the same as that which had originally
separated Mauretania from Numidia (q.v.). These provinces were
governed until the time of Diocletian by imperial procurators, and
were occasionally united for military purposes. Under and after
Diocletian M. Tingitana was attached administratively to the
_dioicesis_ of Spain, with which it was in all respects closely
connected; while M. Caesariensis was divided by making its eastern
part into a separate government, which was called M. Sitifensis from
the Roman colony Sitifis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account