.0054829728
----------- = .000341,
16.083
which is the well-established coefficient of centrifugal force--the
centrifugal force of one pound making one revolution per minute in a
circle of one foot radius.
So we find that the height _AC_ of this triangle represents the
centrifugal force of the reciprocating parts which, in any case, we can
ascertain by the formula
_WRr²C_,
_W_ being the weight of the body;
_R_ being the length of the crank;
_r_ being the number of revolutions per minute, and
_C_ being the coefficient .000341.
This accounts for the fact that the reciprocating parts are perfectly
balanced by an equal weight revolving opposite the crank.
In my treatise on the Richards Indicator and the Development and
Application of Force in the Steam-engine, I have given a full
exposition of this action here briefly outlined, and to that the reader
is referred.
I have only to add that this computation is for horizontal engines.
In vertical engines the effect of gravity must be considered, adding
on the upward stroke and deducting on the downward stroke. Also the
counterbalance in the crank-disk of vertical engines must be limited to
the horizontal fling of the crank end of the connecting-rod, and all
balancing must be as nearly as possible in the same plane.
In this respect double-crank engines have this advantage, that one half
of the counterweight can be put on each side of the center line.
It is evident that the heavier the reciprocating parts and the more
rapid the speed the greater the security for smooth and silent running.
However loose the brasses and however sudden the impact of the steam on
the piston, and however early or late the admission, there can be no
sound or jar, if the inertia of the reciprocating parts is sufficient
to equal the force of the entering steam, and if this is in excess it
can do no harm. It is also evident that under these conditions at any
point in the stroke the change of pressure to the opposite side of the
crank-pin is made insensibly.
Some two or three weeks after this exhibition I received a note from
President Barnard asking me to call upon him. On my responding to
this invitation, he said to me that he had listened to my exposition
of this action before the Polytechnic Club of the Institute, but he
did not understand it; he had witnessed the experiments with my shop
engine, but while he could not question the action in silencing all
knock on the centers, still he did not understand it, and not until he
investigated the problem in his own way by the method of the calculus
did it become plain to him, and he could not see how I had ever been
able to arrive at the exposition of the action without employing that
method. This explains why the subject had not been considered in the
report of the judges. President Barnard afterward kindly gave me a copy
of his demonstration, to insert in my book on the Richards Indicator.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account