Engineers and their triumphs: the story of the locomotive, the steamship, bridge building, tunnel makingHolmes, F. M. (Frederic Morell)
History
Engineers and their triumphs: the story of the locomotive, the steamship, bridge building, tunnel making
Holmes, F. M. (Frederic Morell)
Engineering; Engineers
Why, then, are massive tubular bridges not more generally built?
Because they led to another and very natural development in
bridge-building, a development whereby great strength for long spans is
gained, with, however, a marked saving both in labour and in material.
That development was the lattice bridge.
CHAPTER III.
LATTICE AND SUSPENSION BRIDGES.
“The expense of a tubular bridge would be too great.”
“But if we could get the strength without the expense.”
“What mean you?”
“By iron lattice work we could, I think, gain the stiffness and support
needed, without such great cost of labour and material. In other words,
I propose a lattice or trellis work girder, instead of a solid sided,
or a tubular girder.”
“That is, you would have the sides of lattice or trellis work, instead
of solid plates?”
“Exactly. I would use bars of iron placed diagonally. These lattice or
trellis bridges are developed from the tubular bridges, also from the
loose wooden lattice bridges of America. We make a web of iron instead
of a solid sheet. The same kind of structures are largely used over the
wide rivers of India. Sir John MacNeill designed the first in iron, and
it was built in 1843 on the Dublin and Drogheda Railway with a span
of eighty-four feet. I consider they will be among the most popular
bridges of the future for longish spans.”
The engineer’s prediction has come true; for lattice bridges have
undoubtedly been very widely adopted. We may suppose that he was
advising the directors of a proposed railway, and we doubt not but that
he carried the day.
A fine specimen of a lattice bridge is that across the Thames near
Charing Cross, for the South-Eastern Railway. It has a total length
of more than a quarter of a mile—viz., 1365 feet, and six of its nine
spans are 154 feet wide. Two principal girders, fourteen feet deep,
are connected transversely by other girders which carry the rails and
project on the other side to support a footpath. The two main girders
are nearly fifty feet apart and one weighs 190 tons.
The sides have upper and lower booms made of plate iron connected by
perpendicular bars, between which are a couple of bars crossing each
other diagonally at an angle of forty-five degrees, and fixed to the
booms by bolts of five and seven inches in diameter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account