Europe -- Politics and government -- 1815-1848; France -- Foreign relations -- Great Britain
When the projected agreement and Villiers' covering despatch reached
Paris, whither they had been transmitted, as was the custom, under
flying seal, Granville was so impressed with the necessity of keeping
the matter secret, that he did not even allow the _attachés_ of his
embassy to know of the affair. Furthermore, his own observations upon
the subject were conveyed to Lord Palmerston in a private letter.
"It will not be liked here," he warned his chief. "It is already
thought that Mendizabal is entirely under English influence, and this
admission of English manufactures at a reduced duty, even though
purchased by the guarantee of a loan, will very much confirm the
impression."[367] But all these precautions were of no avail. Within a
few days, Broglie received intelligence of the transaction both from
the French ambassador at Madrid, and from some Spanish agent in Paris.
It seems highly probable that the secret was disclosed by Christina
herself. Perhaps she wished to ingratiate herself with Louis Philippe,
whilst by exposing Mendizabal to his wrath, she may have hoped to
facilitate the return to power of the _Moderados_.
M. de Rayneval having obtained his information "under the seal of the
most profound secrecy," Broglie could not make representations on the
subject of the proposed treaty to the British government. Rayneval,
however, was directed to protest against it at Madrid, and to warn
Mendizabal that, if the affair were to be concluded, "the Quadruple
Alliance would certainly undergo modifications of a nature which Spain
would regret."[368] But the British government, in the meanwhile,
"whilst fully appreciating the motives which had prompted Villiers
to sign the treaty without instructions," had decided not to advise
the King to ratify it. "His Majesty's government," wrote Palmerston,
"does not consider that it would be consistent with the spirit of the
alliance that two out of four should make separately, and without
previous communication with the others, an engagement. . . . Great
Britain would expose herself to the charge of having severed herself
from her allies in order to grasp at an object conducive to her own
particular interests."[369] At the same time, however, he enclosed
the project of a new commercial treaty, which Villiers was to invite
Mendizabal to consider. England, according to its provisions, asked
for no exclusive advantages, the only stipulation being that British
goods should be placed upon a footing of equality with those of the
most favoured nation. The Spanish minister, however, professed his
inability to proceed with the matter. Great Britain's guarantee to a
loan was a condition, he declared, essential to the conclusion of any
commercial treaty. The proposal to admit English cotton goods would be
deeply resented by Spanish manufacturers, and he must, in consequence,
be in a position to show that, by consenting to it, he had gained
some great political advantage.[370] Without doubt, also, he was not
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account