England, Canada and the Great WarDesjardins, L. G. (Louis Georges)
History
England, Canada and the Great War
Desjardins, L. G. (Louis Georges)
Great Britain -- Colonies -- Canada; Imperialism; World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Canada
In all sincerity, I am unable to understand how Mr. Bourassa can expect
to successfully give the lie to such incontrovertible truths as the
guilt of Germany in preparing the war she finally brought on more than
four years ago, and as the unceasing determination of England to
maintain peace.
CHAPTER XXXIII.
A CASE FOR TRUE STATESMANSHIP.
Whatever the TRUE and the FALSE friends of PEACE may hope and say, it is
perfectly useless to close our eyes to the glaring fact that its
restoration can only be the result of military effort combined with the
highest practical statesmanship. After all what has happened, and the
oft-repeated declaration of the Rulers of the belligerent nations, it
would be a complete loss of a very valuable time to indulge any longer
in the expression of views all acknowledge in principle, but which no
one, however well disposed he may be, is actually able to traduce in
practical form.
When writing my French book, in the fall of 1916, reviewing the
situation as it had so far developed, I said:--
"All are most anxious for peace. However it is infinitely better
to look at matters such as they are. It is evident that the
military situation does not offer the least hope that the war
can be immediately brought to an end. Successes have been
achieved on both sides. But nothing decisive has yet happened.
The armies are facing one another in defiant attitude. The
belligerent nations, on both sides, have yet, and for a long
time, great resources in man-power and money."
"If Germany, which should first give up the fight in
acknowledging her crime, is obdurate to final exhaustion, how
can it be possibly expected that the Allies who were forced to
fight, will submit to the humiliation and shame of soliciting
from their cruel enemy a peace the conditions of which, they
know, would be utterly unacceptable. Consequently they must with
an indomitable courage and an invincible perseverance go on
struggling to solve, for a long time, the redoubtable problem to
which they are pledged, in honour bound, to give the only
settlement which can reassure the world."
I am still and absolutely of the same opinion. The present military
situation has certainly much improved in favour of the Allies since
1916. However, looking at the question, first, from the standpoint of
the developing military operations, there is no actual, and there will
not be for many months yet--more or less--practical possibility of a
satisfactory peace settlement.
Secondly, looking at the question from the standpoint of true
statesmanship, it is very easy to draw the inexorable conclusion that,
again, there is not actually the least chance of an immediate
restoration of peace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account