England, Canada and the Great WarDesjardins, L. G. (Louis Georges)
History
England, Canada and the Great War
Desjardins, L. G. (Louis Georges)
Great Britain -- Colonies -- Canada; Imperialism; World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Canada
It was moreover highly probable that, had they tried the game, they
would not have even succeeded, in two-thirds of the constituencies, in
inducing citizens of sufficient standing to accept their nomination and
their political program. Once engaged in such a hopeless electoral
contest, they would have had either to humbly retire from the field, or
to await the doomed day by nominating men of no weight whatever. Both
alternatives would have led them to an equally disastrous defeat.
UNJUST "NATIONALIST" GRIEVANCES AGAINST ENGLAND.
At the end of the very first page of Mr. Bourassa's pamphlet,
entitled:--_What do we owe England_?--in French:--Que devons-nous a
l'Angleterre?,--The following lines are found:--(_Translation._)
British Imperialism, in its concrete and practical form, can be
defined in ten words: =the active participation by the Colonies
in the wars of England=. It is almost precisely the definition I
gave of it as early as the days of the African war. It is exact.
Considered from a larger point of view, from its profound causes
and far reaching consequences, British Imperialism calls for a
more ample definition. Its object is to have Great Britain
dominate the world by means of the organization and
concentration of all the Military Forces of the Empire--both Sea
and Land Forces--; it means the gradual annihilation, or at
least the enslaving of all the divers nationalities constituting
the British Empire, in order to bring about the World's
supremacy of the Anglo-Saxon race, of her thoughts, of her
language, of her political conceptions, of her commerce and her
wealth. Its object is to crush all competitions, all internal
and external oppositions. It is the German Ideal; it is the
Roman Ideal. It is the Imperialism of all countries, at all
times, enlarged to the limits of the monstrous pretensions of
Pan-Anglo-Saxonism.
All the propositions of the above quotation do not bear, for one single
instant, the light of historical research, of reason, even of common
sense.
I challenge Mr. Bourassa, and any one else, to read the speeches and the
writings of all those who have studied the great question of the future
of the British Empire, and to detect therein one single word to justify
the assertion _that the organization and concentration of all the
Military Forces of the Empire have for their object to help England to
dominate the world_.
I have already abundantly proved that England never aspired to dominate
the world. I answered Mr. Bourassa's unfounded propositions as
follows:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account