England under the Angevin Kings, Volume INorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume I
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[668] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 903. The
places specified, besides Hiesmes, are Argentan and Domfront.
See also Chron. S. Albin. a. 1135 (Marchegay, _Eglises_, p.
34), and _Hist. Gaufr. Ducis_ (Marchegay, _Comtes_), p. 294,
where Geoffrey gets the credit of winning them. Rob. Torigni,
a. 1135, adds Ambrières, “Gorra” and Coulommiers.
[669] Will. Malm. _Hist. Nov._, l. i. c. 11 (Hardy, p. 703).
Stephen’s promptitude served him as well as the promptitude of William
Rufus and Henry had served them in a like case. But this time the
part which had been played in 1087 by the primate and in 1100 by “the
Witan who were there nigh at hand” was to be played by the citizens of
London. Repulsed from Dover and Canterbury[670]--for the men of Kent
had an hereditary grudge against any one coming from Boulogne--Stephen
pushed on to London, where the well-known face of King Henry’s
favourite nephew was hailed with delight by the citizens, vehemently
declaring that they would have no stranger to rule over them.[671]
They claimed to have inherited the right to a voice in the election
of the sovereign which had once, in theory at least, belonged to the
whole nation, and accordingly the “aldermen and wise folk”[672] came
together to consider what provision should be made for the safety of
the realm, and, for that end, to choose a king. A kingless land, said
they, was exposed to countless perils; the first thing needful was to
make a king as speedily as possible.[673] Of Matilda and her claims not
a word seems to have been said; if any of the leading burgesses, as
tenants-in-chief of the crown, had sworn fealty to her, they were in no
humour to regard it now; and the citizens in general would doubtless
not hold themselves bound by an oath which they had not personally
taken. They claimed the right of election as their special prerogative,
and exercising it without more ado in favour of the only person then at
hand whose birth and character fitted him to undertake the defence of
the kingdom, and who seemed to have been sent to them as by a special
providence in their hour of need, they by common consent acknowledged
Stephen as king. He hurried to Winchester to get possession of the
treasury; the bishop--his own brother--came forth with the chief
citizens to meet him; and the treasurer, who had refused to give up
his keys to the bishop, surrendered them at once to the king-elect.[674]
[670] Gerv. Cant. (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 94.
[671] _Gesta Steph._ (Sewell), pp. 3, 4.
[672] “Majores ... natu, consultuque quique provectiores.”
_Gesta Steph._ (Sewell), p. 3.
[673] _Ib._ pp. 3, 4.
[674] _Gesta Steph._ (Sewell), pp. 4–6.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account