England under the Angevin Kings, Volume IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
When England was secured, it was comparatively a light matter to secure
the rest. Louis of France was so dismayed at the sudden collapse of
the rebellion in England--a collapse which necessarily entailed a like
fate upon the rebellion in Normandy, since the leaders were the same
men in both cases--that he at once recalled the young king and the
count of Flanders from their project of invasion. As a last resource,
all three concentrated their forces upon the siege of Rouen.[822] Its
garrison held out gallantly until Henry had time to recross the sea
with his Brabantines and a thousand Welshmen[823] who had already done
good service under Rees Ap-Griffith at the siege of Tutbury.[824]
On August 11, three days after landing, he entered Rouen;[825] a
successful raid of his Welshmen upon some French convoys, followed by
an equally successful sally of Henry himself against the besieging
forces, sufficed to make Louis ask for a truce, under cover of which he
fled with his whole host back into his own dominions.[826] Some three
weeks later[827] he and Henry met in conference at Gisors and arranged
a suspension of hostilities until Michaelmas on all sides, except
between Henry and his son Richard, who was fighting independently
against his father’s loyal subjects in Poitou.[828] Henry marched
southward at once; Richard fled before him from place to place, leaving
his conquests to fall back one by one into the hands of their rightful
owner; at last he suddenly returned to throw himself at his father’s
feet, and a few days before Michaelmas Henry concluded his war in
Poitou[829] by entering Poitiers in triumph with Richard, penitent and
forgiven, at his side.[830]
[822] _Gesta Hen._ (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 73. Rog. Howden as
above, p. 64. Will. Newb., l. ii. c. 36 (Howlett, vol. i. p.
190). Gerv. Cant. (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 249. R. Diceto (Stubbs),
vol. i. p. 386.
[823] _Gesta Hen._ as above, p. 74.
[824] See R. Diceto as above, p. 384. It seems most likely that
these were the same. The Pipe Roll of 1174 (Eyton, _Itin. Hen.
II._, p. 183) has a charge of £4: 18: 11 “in corredio Reis et
aliorum Walensium qui venerunt ad regem in expedicionem.”
[825] R. Diceto as above, p. 385. _Gesta Hen._ as above. Rog.
Howden as above, p. 65.
[826] See the details of Louis’s disgraceful conduct in _Gesta
Hen._ as above, pp. 74–76, Rog. Howden as above, pp. 65, 66, R.
Diceto as above, pp. 386, 387, Gerv. Cant. as above, p. 250,
and Will. Newb., l. ii. cc. 36 and 37 (as above, pp. 192–196).
[827] On September 8. _Gesta Hen._ as above, p. 76.
[828] _Gesta Hen._ (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 76. Rog. Howden
(Stubbs), vol. ii. p. 66. Rob. Torigni, a. 1174.
[829] “Et sic finivit rex gwerram suam in Pictaviâ,” comments
the writer of the _Gesta Hen._ (as above) on the reconciliation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account