England under the Angevin Kings, Volume IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
officers of his own appointment[1124]--but still as his father’s
representative, charged in his name with the maintenance of obedience
and order.[1125] As for Eleanor, Henry had clearly never intended again
to intrust her with any real authority; and in April he carried her
back with him to England.[1126]
[1115] _Gesta Hen._ as above, pp. 311, 312. Gerv. Cant.
(Stubbs), vol. i. p. 309. On this quarrel cf. Rigord (Duchesne,
_Hist. Franc. Scriptt._, vol. v.), pp. 12, 13, and Gir. Cambr.
_De Instr. Princ._, dist. iii. c. 2 (Angl. Christ. Soc.,
pp. 88–90). This last version is extremely confused in its
chronology. The main facts of the case are these: Philip of
Flanders and Isabel his wife had no children, and they had
quarrelled (_Gesta Hen._ as above, pp. 99, 100). Philip’s
heir-presumptive was his sister Margaret, wife of Count Baldwin
of Hainaut, and after her, her son, another Baldwin. In 1180,
however, Philip proposed, instead of leaving all his dominions
to his sister and her son, to settle the southern half of them,
comprising Vermandois and Flanders south of the river Lys, upon
her daughter Elizabeth, whom he had just given in marriage to
Philip of France. (_Ib._ p. 245.) He meant to leave them to her
on his own death; but when his wife died, in 1182 (_ib._ p.
285), Philip Augustus laid claim to her two counties as lapsed
fiefs. King and count went on quarrelling till 1186, when, as
we shall see, the matter was settled by the immediate cession
of Vermandois to Philip Augustus, who thereupon agreed to wait
for the rest till the Flemish count’s death.
[1116] _Gesta Hen._ (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 312. Gerv. Cant.
(Stubbs), vol. i. p. 309.
[1117] _Gesta Hen._ as above, pp. 321, 322. Cf. Rog. Howden
(Stubbs), vol. ii. p. 288, and R. Diceto (Stubbs), vol. ii. p.
32.
[1118] _Gesta Hen._ as above, p. 337. R. Diceto as above, p. 34.
[1119] _Gesta Hen._ as above, pp. 337, 338. Cf. Rog. Howden as
above, p. 304.
[1120] Rigord (Duchesne, _Hist. Franc. Scriptt._, vol. v.),
p. 20. Will. Armor., _Gesta Phil. Aug._ (_ibid._), p. 73.
According to the _Gesta Hen._ as above, p. 346, Bela’s first
suit was to Henry, for the hand of his granddaughter Matilda of
Saxony; but Henry, “ut mos suus erat,” was so slow in answering
that Bela, tired of waiting, transferred his proposals to
Margaret. On the other hand, Gerv. Cant. (Stubbs), vol. i.
pp. 336, 337, charges Henry with having contrived Margaret’s
marriage with Bela on purpose to get her to a safe distance,
whence neither she nor her husband could reclaim the dowry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account