England under the Angevin Kings, Volume IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[280] Ep. ccviii. (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. v. pp. 417, 418).
The Pope’s brief is Ep. clxxii. (_ib._ pp. 328, 329); it is
dated “Anagniæ, vii. Idus Octobris,” but its true date is
Easter-day, April 24 (see editor’s note, p. 329)--the actual
date of the letter whereby Alexander notified his act to
the English bishops; Ep. clxxiii. (Robertson, as above, pp.
229–231). The diocese (not the province) of York was exempted
from Thomas’s legatine jurisdiction--the reason being that
Roger of York was legate for Scotland (Ep. cclxx., _ib._ vol.
vi. p. 119). Thomas sent the brief over to his friends Robert
of Hereford and Roger of Worcester, bidding them communicate
it to their brethren, beginning with London (Ep. clxxix.,
_ib._ vol. v. pp. 344–346). Canon Robertson supposes this
brief to have been delivered to Gilbert on the feast of the
Commemoration of S. Paul, _i.e._ June 30, 1166. Gilbert himself
says merely “die beati Pauli”; and his letter has no date. But
it mentions “legatos qui diriguntur ad nos”; and there is no
hint elsewhere of any talk about sending legates till late in
the autumn, or even winter. There really seems to be no reason
why we should not adopt a more obvious rendering of the date,
as representing the greater and better-known festival of S.
Paul’s Conversion. In that case, of course, the year must be
1167.
[281] Will. Cant. (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. i.), p. 50. E.
Grim (_ib._ vol. ii.), p. 414. Will. Fitz-Steph. (_ib._ vol.
iii.), p. 83. Herb. Bosh. (_ibid._), p. 397. Anon. I. (_ib._
vol. iv.), p. 65. Cf. _Thomas Saga_ (Magnusson), vol. i. p. 371.
[282] Gerv. Cant. (Stubbs), vol. i. pp. 201, 202.
[283] E. Grim (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. ii.), p. 415. Herb.
Bosh. (_ib._ vol. iii.), pp. 403, 404; etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account