England under the Angevin Kings, Volume IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volume II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
Three years before, he had wrung from the Pope--then blockaded in Rome
by the Imperial troops, and in the last extremity of peril--a brief
authorizing young Henry’s coronation by the archbishop of York, in
default of the absent primate of all England.[300] In face of a mass of
earlier and later rescripts from Alexander’s predecessors and Alexander
himself, all strenuously confirming the exclusive privileges of
Canterbury, Henry had never yet ventured to make use of this document;
like Adrian’s bull for the conquest of Ireland, it had been kept in
reserve for a future day; and that day had now come. In vain did Thomas
proclaim his threatened interdict;[301] in vain did the Pope ratify
it;[302] in vain did both alike issue prohibitions to all the English
bishops against the act which they knew to be in contemplation.[303]
The vigilance of the justiciars, quickened by a fresh set of stringent
injunctions sent over by the king in the previous autumn,[304] made
the delivery of letters from either primate or Pope so difficult that
Thomas at last could intrust it to no one but a nun, Idonea, whom he
solemnly charged with the duty of presenting to Roger of York the papal
brief in which the coronation was forbidden.[305] The ceremony was
fixed for Sunday, June 14. A week before that date young Henry, who
with his girl-bride Margaret of France had been left at Caen under the
care of his mother and Richard of Hommet the constable of Normandy,
was summoned to join his father in England.[306] On S. Barnabas’s day
the bishops and barons assembled at Westminster in obedience to the
royal summons;[307] on Saturday, the 13th, the Pope’s letter was at
last forced upon the archbishop of York;[308] but none the less did he
on the following morning crown and anoint young Henry in Westminster
abbey; while Gilbert of London, who had managed to extort conditional
absolution in the Pope’s name from Archbishop Rotrou of Rouen,[309]
once more stood openly by his side in the foremost rank of the English
bishops.[310]
[300] Ep. cccx. (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. vi. pp. 206, 207).
See the editor’s note as to the date.
[301] Epp. dclxxviii.–dclxxxiii. (_ib._ vol. vii. pp. 320–325).
[302] Epp. dcxxviii.–dcxxx. (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. vii. pp.
210–214).
[303] Epp. dcxxxii., dcxxxiii., dcxlviii.–dcli. (_ib._ pp. 216,
217, 256–264). Herb. Bosh. (_ib._ vol. iii.), p. 462, puts this
interdict too late.
[304] The “ten ordinances”; Ep. dxcix. (_ib._ vol. vii. pp.
147–149); Will. Cant. (_ib._ vol. i.), pp. 53–55; Gerv. Cant.
(Stubbs), vol. i. pp. 214–216; Rog. Howden (Stubbs), vol. i.
pp. 231–236; on the date see Bishop Stubbs’s note at last
reference.
[305] Ep. dclxxii. (Robertson, _Becket_, vol. vii. pp.
307–309). See the editor’s note.
[306] Ep. dclxxiii. (_ibid._), pp. 309, 312.
[307] _Gesta Hen._ (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 5.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account