England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[340] Ademar of Chabanais, _Rer. Gall. Scriptt._, vol. x. p.
149.
[341] “Vulgo, sed parum Latine, cognominari Evigilans-canem
pro ingenti probitate promeruit. Nam ... in eundem [sc.
Fulconem] arma levans nocturnas expeditiones crebro agebat, et
Andegavenses homines et canes in ipsâ urbe, vel in munitioribus
oppidis terrebat, et horrendis assultibus pavidos vigilare
cogebat.” Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._) p.
532. It is however only fair to add that in another place
(_ib._ p. 487) Orderic says Herbert “vulgo Evigilans-canem
cognominabatur, propter gravissimas infestationes quas
a perfidis affinibus suis Andegavensibus incessanter
patiebatur”--as if he kept the Cenomannian dogs awake to give
notice of the enemy’s approach, we must suppose.
[342] Ademar of Chabanais (_Rer. Gall. Scriptt._, vol. x.),
p. 161; Will. Poitiers (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p.
189; Will. Malm. _Gesta Reg._, l. iii. c. 235 (Hardy, p. 401).
Ademar says Herbert’s imprisonment lasted two years; and the
Chronn. S. Albin. and Vindoc. a. 1027 (Marchegay, _Eglises_,
pp. 22, 167), give us the date of his release, by giving that
of the Breton invasion which followed it.
[343] “Hugonis ... quem Fulco senior sibi violentur
subjugârat.” Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._),
p. 532. The terms of Herbert’s submission to Fulk are matter
of inference from what followed his release. He at once
began to quarrel with Avesgaud, the bishop of Le Mans, and
being by him defied and excommunicated, called in the help
of Duke Alan of Britanny (_Acta Pontif. Cenoman._, c. 30, in
Mabillon, _Vet. Analecta_, p. 304). Alan, when he had helped
to defeat the bishop, marched down to besiege Le Lude, one
of the chief Angevin fortresses on the Cenomannian border,
and only desisted when he had extorted from Fulk the hostages
given him by Herbert on his release; Chron. Vindoc. a. 1027
(Marchegay, _Eglises_, p. 166). It is not hard to see why the
rival overlord of Nantes should be ready to make war, on any
pretext, upon the count of Anjou; but, making due allowance
for Fulk’s possible difficulties--Odo’s last attack occurred
in this year--still it is very hard to see why Fulk, “the
ingenious Fulk,” as the writer of the _Gesta Amb. Domin._
calls him (Marchegay, _Comtes_, p. 165), could find no better
way of raising the siege of a petty border-fortress than by
making restitution to Herbert at the bidding of Alan, unless
he felt so sure of his hold over Herbert as not to think the
hostages worth keeping. The striking resemblance between Fulk’s
treatment of Herbert and his father’s treatment of Guerech also
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account