England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
wise, to answer the appeal for succour made to each in turn by the
Norman garrison of Le Mans; Elias received their submission and sent
them home in peace;[546] and thenceforth the foreign oppressor trod
the soil of Maine no more. When the final struggle for Normandy broke
out between Robert and Henry, Elias, with characteristic good sense,
commended himself to the one overlord whom he saw to be worthy of
his homage.[547] Henry was wise enough loyally to accept the service
and the friendship which Rufus had scorned; and he proved its value
on the field of Tinchebray, where Elias and his Cenomannians decided
the battle in his favour, and thus made him master of Normandy. On
the other hand, the dread of Angevin tyranny had changed into a
glad anticipation of peaceful and equal union. The long battle of
Cenomannian freedom, so often baffled and so often renewed, was won at
last. When next a duke of Normandy disputed the possession of Maine
with a count of Anjou, he disputed it not with a rival oppressor but
with the husband of its countess, the lawful heir of Elias; and the
triumph of Cenomannia received its fitting crown when Henry’s daughter
wedded Aremburg’s son in the minster of S. Julian at Le Mans.
[536] Letter of the legate, Archbishop Hugh of Lyons, dated
S. Florence of Saumur, S. John Baptist’s day, 1094; _Gallia
Christiana_, vol. iv., instrum. cols. 10, 11.
[537] Chronn. Rain. Andeg., S. Albin., S. Serg., a. 1095
(Marchegay, _Eglises_, pp. 14, 27, 140); Chron. S. Maxent.
a. 1096 (_ib._ p. 411). This last is the right year; see the
itinerary of Pope Urban in Gaul, in _Rer. Gall. Scriptt._, vol.
xii. pp. 3 note _m_, and 65 note _d_.
[538] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), pp.
769–771. _Acta Pontif. Cenoman._ c. 35 (Mabillon, _Vet. Anal._,
p. 313). The exact date of the capture is April 20, 1098;
Chron. S. Albin. ad ann. (Marchegay, _Eglises_, p. 28).
[539] _Acta Pontif. Cenoman._ c. 35 (Mabillon, _Vet. Anal._, p.
313). _Gesta Cons._ (Marchegay, _Comtes_), p. 142.
[540] “Quia capitalis dominus erat.” Ord. Vit. (Duchesne,
_Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 772.
[541] _Ibid._ _Acta Pontif. Cenoman._, as above.
[542] _Acta Pontif. Cenoman._ (as above), p. 314.
[543] _Ibid._ Ord. Vit., as above.
[544] Ord. Vit. (as above), p. 773.
[545] _Ib._ pp. 774, 775. _Acta Pontif. Cenoman._, as above.
[546] Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), pp. 784,
785.
[547] _Ib._ p. 822.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive