England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[587] “Trium urbium dominus.” I think it is Orderic who
somewhere thus expressively designates the lord of Angers and
Le Mans and Tours.
[588] This seems to be the meaning of Will. Malm. _Gesta
Reg._, l. v. c. 419 (Hardy, p. 652); “Quin et Ierosolymam
Fulco ire contendens, comitatum commendavit regi suum, si
viveret; futurum profecto generi, si non rediret.” The “county”
in question can only be Maine, of the gift of which to the
Ætheling at his marriage William has just been speaking.
[589] _Acta Pontif. Cenoman._ c. 35 (Mabillon, _Vet. Anal._, p.
318).
[590] In company with Rainald, bishop of Angers, in 1120.
Chronn. S. Albin. and S. Flor. Salm. ad ann. (Marchegay,
_Eglises_, pp. 32, 190).
[591] Eng. Chron. a. 1120; Will. Malm. _Gesta Reg._, l. v. c.
419 (Hardy, pp. 653, 654); Hen. Hunt., l. vii. c. 32 (Arnold,
p. 242); Eadmer, _Hist. Nov._ (Rule), pp. 288, 289; Ord. Vit.
(Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), pp. 868, 869, etc.
In that wreck perished not merely Fulk’s hopes for the settlement of
Maine, but Henry’s hopes for the settlement of England and Normandy.
Setting aside the father’s personal grief for the loss of his favourite
child, the Ætheling’s death was the most terrible political blow that
could have fallen upon Henry. All his hopes for the continuance of his
work were bound up in the life of his son. The toils and struggles of
twenty years would be little more than lost labour unless he could
guard against two dangers which had been the bane of both England and
Normandy ever since the Conqueror’s death:--a disputed succession
to the English throne, and a separation between the insular and the
continental dominions of the ducal house. In the person of William
the Ætheling both dangers seemed provided against; if Henry lived but
a few years more, there was every reason to expect that William, and
William alone among the Conqueror’s surviving descendants, would be
able to mount the English throne without opposition. On any accepted
principle, his only possible competitor would have been his cousin and
namesake the Clito. Neither people nor barons would have been likely to
think for a moment of setting aside the son of their crowned king and
queen--a king born in the land and a queen who represented the ancient
blood-royal of England--for a landless, homeless stranger whose sole
claim rested on the fact that by strict rule of primogeniture he was
the heir male of the Conqueror; and, once master of England, William
might fairly be expected to keep his hold upon Normandy as his father
had done. The shipwreck of November 1120, however, left Henry suddenly
face to face with the almost certain prospect of being succeeded in
all his dominions by his brother’s son, his enemy, the rival of his
lost boy, the one person of all others whose succession would be most
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account