England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and IINorgate, Kate
History
England under the Angevin Kings, Volumes I and II
Norgate, Kate
Anjou, House of; England -- Civilization -- 1066-1485; Great Britain -- History -- Angevin period, 1154-1216
[679] Rog. Wend. (Coxe), vol. ii. p. 217. Cf. the speeches
before the battle of Lincoln in Hen. Hunt., l. viii. c. 15
(Arnold, p. 270), and that of Stephen’s advocates at Rome in
1151, in _Hist. Pontif._ (Pertz, _Mon. Germ. Hist._, vol. xx.
p. 543). Gerv. Cant. (as above) does not name Hugh, but merely
says “quidam ex potentissimis Angliæ.”
[680] _Gesta Steph._ (Sewell), p. 8. R. Wend. as above.
[681] _Gesta Steph._ (Sewell), pp. 1, 2.
[682] Will. Malm. _Hist. Nov._, l. i. c. 11 (Hardy, p. 704).
[683] Gerv. Cant. (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 94. Flor. Worc. Contin.
(Thorpe, vol. ii. p. 95).
[684] The date is variously given, as follows: December 15,
Ord. Vit. (Duchesne, _Hist. Norm. Scriptt._), p. 902.--December
20, Flor. Worc. Contin. (as above).--December 21, Ann. Waverl.
a. 1136 (Luard, _Ann. Monast._, vol. ii. p. 225).--December 22,
Will. Malm. _Hist. Nov._, l. i. c. 12 (Hardy, p. 704); Gerv.
Cant. (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 94; and Ann. Winton. Contin. a. 1135
(Liebermann, _Ungedruckte Anglo-Norman. Geschichtsquellen_,
p. 79).--December 23, Ann. Cantuar. a. 1135 (Liebermann, as
above, p. 5).--December 24, Ann. Margam, a. 1135 (Luard, as
above, vol. i. p. 13).--December 25, Eng. Chron. a. 1135; Ric.
Hexh. (Raine, _Priory of Hexham_, vol. i.) p. 70; _Gesta Cons._
(Marchegay, _Comtes_), p. 156; and Chron. Mort.-Mar. a. 1135
(_Rer. Gall. Scriptt._, vol. xii. p. 782).--December 26, Rog.
Howden (Stubbs), vol. i. p. 189; Rog. Wend. (Coxe), vol. ii. p.
217.--January 1, Joh. Hexh. (Raine), p. 113.--Will. Malm., the
Contin. Flor. Worc., and the Ann. Margam all add that the day
was a Sunday. This in 1135 would be right for William’s date,
December 22; nothing can make it agree with that of Florence’s
continuator, “xiii. kal. Jan.”; but the Margam annalist may
very possibly have substituted ix. for xi., really meaning the
same as William. The two extreme dates--Orderic’s and John of
Hexham’s--seem equally impossible; unless we may take Orderic’s
“xviii. kal. Jan.” to have simply an x too much, and then there
would be another witness for Christmas-day.
[685] Stubbs, _Select Charters_, p. 119.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account