Ballads, English -- England -- Texts; Ballads, Scots -- Scotland -- Texts
Referring now to the history of St. Cunigund, we read in the papal bull
of Innocent III., by which she was canonized in the year 1200, that "she
consecrated her virginity to the Lord, and preserved it intact,--so
that when at one time by the instigation of the enemy of mankind a
suspicion had been raised against her, she, to prove her innocence,
walked with bare feet over burning ploughshares, and came off
unscathed." Again, we read in a slightly more recent German chronicle,
as follows: "The Devil, who hates all the righteous, and is ever seeking
to bring them to shame, stirred up the Emperor against his wife,
persuading him, through a certain duke, that in contempt of her husband
she had committed adultery with another man. The empress offered to
undergo an ordeal, and a great many bishops came to see it carried out.
Whereupon seven glowing ploughshares were laid on the ground, over which
the empress was forced to walk in bare feet, to attest her innocence,
... which, when the king saw, he prostrated himself before her with all
his nobles." Adalbert's Life of St. Henry (which is, at the latest, of
the 12th century), agreeing in all essentials with these accounts, adds
an important particular, explaining how it was that the Devil brought
the queen's honor into question, namely, that he was seen by many to go
in and out of her private chamber, in the likeness of a handsome young
man.--St. Cunigund is said to have undergone the ordeal at Bamberg, in
the year 1017. The story, however, is without foundation, not being
mentioned by any contemporary writers, but first appearing in various
legends, towards the year 1200.
But St. Cunigund is by no means the first German empress of whom the
story under consideration is told. A writer contemporary with her, who
has nothing to say about the miracle just recounted, relates something
very similar of _another_ empress, one hundred and thirty years earlier,
namely, of Richardis, wife of Charles III. The tale runs that this
Charles, in the year 887, accused his queen of unlawful connection with
a Bishop. Her Majesty offered to subject herself to the Judgment of God,
either by duel or by the ordeal of burning ploughshares. It is not said
that either test was applied, but only that the queen retired into a
cloister which she had herself founded. This is the contemporary
account. A century and a half later we are told that an ordeal by
_water_ was actually undergone, which again is changed by later writers
into an ordeal by _fire_,--the empress passing through the flames in a
waxed garment, without receiving the least harm; in memory of which, a
day was kept, five centuries after, in honor of St. Richardis, in the
monastery to which she withdrew.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account