English Cathedrals Illustrated: Second and Revised EditionBond, Francis
History
English Cathedrals Illustrated: Second and Revised Edition
Bond, Francis
Cathedrals -- England; Cathedrals -- Wales
VIII. In recent times vast sums have been spent in underpinning and
securing the walls and tower: and we have had the amazing west front and
transept-ends designed by Lord Grimthorpe.
The “Annals of an Abbey,” in Froude’s “Short Studies,” should be read.
The Cathedral Church of St. Mary, Salisbury.
[Illustration]
Two English cathedrals surpass all others in external effect: Lincoln and
Salisbury; each of them being at its best as seen from the north-east.
But Lincoln lacks “the quiet tranquillity of the close of Salisbury,
the half-hidden houses, covered with vines and creepers, that nestle
among the trees, the sense of being shut off from the work-a-day world.
If Durham seems the petrified interpretation of the Church militant,
Salisbury is the very type and picture of the Church of the Prince of
Peace. Unworldliness and peace brood over church and close.”
The ancient Norman cathedral stood within the fortifications of Old
Sarum. The site was cramped, and extension was impossible; there was
far too much wind and far too little water; moreover the soldiers
who garrisoned the castle were most objectionable neighbours. So, by
permission of the Pope, Bishop Richard Poore in 1220 commenced a new
cathedral on the present site.
It was a virgin site; and from this fact resulted a cathedral different
from any other that we possess, and as a study in design more important
than any other we possess. In other cathedrals we study the mediæval
architect designing under difficulties; what we see in such a composite
cathedral as Hereford or Chichester or Rochester is not one design,
but a dozen designs trying to blend into one design; sometimes, as
at Canterbury and Rochester, rather ineffectually, sometimes, as at
Hereford, with remarkable success. At Salisbury it is not so: the design
is one design, all sprang from a single brain, except the west front and
possibly the upper part of tower and spire. We have no such homogeneous
design in our mediæval cathedrals. The French were less conservative,
perhaps less penurious; their Gothic architects were iconoclasts; no
French architect could have allowed such frightful solecisms to remain as
disfigure our cathedrals to the purist eye, and endear them to the artist.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account