Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Great Britain -- Social conditions
uncle, which they have thereof, reasonably testifies. Witnesses as
above. Given [at Westminster on 24 March in the 11th year of our reign].
[Footnote 172: Oxford was also affiliated to London by charter of 13
Henry III. [Charter Roll, 13 Henry III., p. 1, m. 12.]]
[Footnote 173: _i.e._ General rights of jurisdiction.]
7. BONDMAN RECEIVED IN A BOROUGH [_Bracton's Notebook, III_, 243, No.
1228], 1237-8.
Order was made to the bailiffs of Andover that at the first coming of
the lord the King to Clarendon they shew cause to the lord the King,
wherefore they have detained from Everard le Tyeis William of Amesbury,
his bondman and fugitive, inasmuch as he claims him at the time and
hours, as he says, etc.
And Adam de Marisco and other bailiffs of Andover come and say that the
aforesaid William was at one time dwelling at Wilton and was a
travelling merchant and married a woman in the town of Andover, and
within the year in which he married the same Everard came and sought him
as his bondman and fugitive, but they refused to deliver him to him and
dared not without the lord the King's command.
Afterwards the same Everard comes, and remits and quit-claims to the
lord the King and his heirs the aforesaid William with his whole brood,
etc.
8. AN INTER-MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT IN RESPECT OF TOLL [_Charter Roll, 23
Henry III, m. 3_], 1239.
The King to archbishops, etc. greeting. Know ye that whereas a dispute
was raised in our Court before us between our good men of Marlborough,
complainants, and our good men of Southampton, deforciants, of toll
which the aforesaid men of Southampton took from our men of Marlborough
against their liberties which they have by charter of King John, our
father, and by our charter, as they asserted; at length by our licence
it is covenanted between them on this wise, that all our men of
Marlborough, who are in the gild merchant of Marlborough and will
establish the same, be quit for ever of all custom and all manner of
toll in the town of Southampton and in all the appurtenances thereof,
whereof the men of Southampton within their liberty can acquit the said
men of Marlborough, notwithstanding that the charter of the same men of
Southampton is prior to the charters of the aforesaid men of
Marlborough;[174] and in like manner that the men of Southampton be quit
of all custom and toll in the town of Marlborough. We, therefore,
willing that the aforesaid covenant be firm and stable for ever, grant
and confirm it for us and our heirs. Witnesses:--Richard, count of
Poitou and earl of Cornwall, our brother, etc., as above [17 June,
Westminster].
[Footnote 174: The legal rule evolved in the thirteenth century for
cases where the crown granted to one town freedom from toll, and to
another town the right to exact toll, was that priority of grant
prevailed; _cf._ Bracton _f._ 56_b_. By grants of incompatible charters
the crown obtained fees from two sets of petitioners, and also costs
from the subsequent litigation.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account