{125} A passage from Hacket’s _Life of Archbishop Williams_, part 2, p.
144, marks the first rise of this word, and the quarter from
whence it arose: “When they [the Presbyterians] saw that he was
not _selfish_ (it is a word of their own new mint), etc”. In
Whitlock’s _Zootomia_ (1654) there is another indication of it as
a novelty, p. 364: “If constancy may be tainted with this
_selfishness_ (to use our _new wordings_ of old and general
actings)”--It is he who in his striking essay, _The Grand
Schismatic, or Suist Anatomized_, puts forward his own words,
‘suist’, and ‘suicism’, in lieu of those which have ultimately
been adopted. ‘Suicism’, let me observe, had not in his time the
obvious objection of resembling another word nearly, and being
liable to be confused with it; for ‘suicide’ did not then exist in
the language, nor indeed till some twenty years later. The coming
up of ‘suicide’ is marked by this passage in Phillips’ _New World
of Words_, 1671, 3rd ed.: “Nor less to be exploded is the word
‘_suicide_’, which may as well seem to participate of _sus_ a sow,
as of the pronoun _sui_”. In the _Index_ to Jackson’s Works,
published two years later, it is still ‘_suicidium_’--“the horrid
_suicidium_ of the Jews at York”. ‘Suicide’ is apparently of much
later introduction into French. Génin (_Récréations Philol._ vol.
i, p. 194) places it about the year 1728, and makes the Abbé
Desfontaines its first sponsor. He is wrong, as the words just
quoted show, in supposing that we borrowed it from the French, or
that the word did not exist in English till the middle of last
century. The French sometimes complain that the fashion of suicide
was borrowed from England. It would seem at all events probable
that the word was so borrowed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account