Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
[357] Even so populous a town as Newcastle-on-Tyne refused to
remove its children from the workhouse. We see the Poor Law
inspector arranging a special visit to inspect them, and to confer
with the guardians to urge a district school (MS. Minutes,
Newcastle Board of Guardians, 10th August and 21st September
1849). He then presses for a joint conference, which does nothing
but adjourn (_ibid._ 17th January and 14th March 1850). Nothing is
done. Six years after he finds the education is still in a
deplorable state (_ibid._ 29th August and 3rd October 1856), and
gets the infants into a separate building. The guardians will not
appoint a resident schoolmaster (_ibid._ 12th December 1856; 23rd
January, 29th May, 18th August, 4th September 1857). It takes
three months and three urgent appeals to get them to appoint an
additional infants' mistress (_ibid._ 19th November 1858; 21st
January, 11th February, 25th February 1859).
[358] The disfavour with which, as we have noted, the Central
Authority regarded apprenticeship, seems to have continued. The
Special Orders of 31st December 1844, and 29th January 1845
(issued to several hundred unions), severely restricting
apprenticeship, and the amending Special Orders of 15th and 22nd
August 1845, which slightly mitigated these restrictions, were
continued in force. Some of the provisions were relaxed in special
cases (_e.g._ Special Order of 11th August 1855, to Leicester
Union for a deaf and dumb girl). No General Order seems to have
been issued on the subject between 1847 and 1871; nor do we trace
any instructions or advice to boards of guardians as to the steps
to be taken to place boys and girls out in advantageous callings.
A few decisions on legal points tended rather to restrict
apprenticeship. The Central Authority held that a child could not
be apprenticed to domestic service as it was not a "trade or
business"; nor bound to a married woman, nor beyond the age of
twenty-one (_Official Circular_, No. 54, N.S., 1856, p. 38;
_ibid._ No. 46, N.S., February 1851, p. 17; _ibid._ No. 34, N.S.,
February 1850, pp. 17-18). In 1851, Parliament passed the Poor Law
(Apprentices) Act (14 & 15 Vic. c. 11), for preventing cruelty to
apprentices; and the Central Authority, in transmitting this
statute to the boards of guardians, carefully abstained from any
indication of policy, as to how pauper children should be placed
out in life (Circular Letter, 26th June 1851, in Fourth Annual
Report, 1851, pp. 19-21). As a minor instance of the merging of
branches of the Poor Law into the general treatment of all classes
of the community, it may be noted that this Act was repealed in
1861, its provisions being practically embodied in the Offences
against the Person Act (24 & 25 Vic. c. 100, sec. 26).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account