Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
the reach of the independent labourers consulting the "sixpenny doctor,"
and even beyond the usual resources of the provident dispensaries of the
period.[379] Finally, in 1867, the Metropolitan Poor Act authorised the
establishment throughout London of Poor Law dispensaries. These
institutions were consistently pressed on the Metropolitan boards of
guardians by the Central Authority, as having been successful in Ireland
in reducing the amount of sickness among the poor, and as ensuring, not
only regular and more successful medical attention, but also a
sufficient supply of medicines and medical appliances of standard
quality.[380] By this elaborate systematisation of outdoor medical
relief, the Central Authority not only put within the reach of the sick
paupers medical attendance far superior to that accessible to the lowest
grade of independent labourers, but even placed the sick pauper in the
Metropolis, without loss of liberty, in a position equal to that of the
superior artisan subscribing to a good provident dispensary.
[375] _See_, for instance, _The Administration of Medical Relief
to the Poor--Reports by the Poor Law Committee of the Provincial
Medical and Surgical Association_, 1842; _Life and Times of Thomas
Wakley_, by S. Squire Sprigge, 1897.
[376] Mr. Baines (President of the Poor Law Board), 12th July
1853; _Hansard_, vol. 129, p. 138.
[377] Sixteenth Annual Report, 1863-4, p. 108.
[378] Circular of 12th April 1865, in Eighteenth Annual Report,
1865-6, pp. 23-24.
[379] Some boards of guardians rebelled in this connection against
a departure from the principle of "less eligibility" that they did
not understand. When the circular of the Central Authority
inviting compliance with the recommendation of the House of
Commons Committee reached the Manchester Board of Guardians, it
was referred to a committee. When the committee, after eighteen
months' delay, recommended compliance, its report was rejected
(MS. Minutes, Manchester Board of Guardians, 20th April 1865, and
25th October 1866).
[380] Twenty-second Annual Report, 1869-70, pp. xliv-lii.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account