Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
Prior to 1877 the Central Authority held that children boarded out
within the union, being merely cases of outdoor relief, did not require
these precautions. From 1877 onward similar precautions were required in
their cases. Such children became thus differentiated from other
children on outdoor relief, on whose behalf no such requirements are
insisted on. For the boarded-out children a payment was approved of 4s.
a week each (afterwards raised to 5s.), a sum to be contrasted with the
1s. or 1s. 6d. for each child which is the usual sum allowed for each
child on ordinary outdoor relief.[638]
[638] The rate of 1s. and one loaf for the support per week of
each child on outdoor relief was deliberately sanctioned, in 1869,
by a Conference of Metropolitan Guardians, presided over by Mr.
Corbett (Mr. Corbett's Report of 10th August 1871, as reprinted
for official circulation in 1873 by the Central Authority). The
dividing line between children merely on this outdoor relief, and
those "boarded out" at 4s. or 5s. per week, it must be remembered,
is not kinship, but whether or not the person with whom the child
lives is legally liable for its maintenance. Thus, the policy of
the Central Authority has been that children living with a
stepfather and stepmother, with a widower stepfather, with a
widowed stepmother, or even with a brother, a sister, an uncle, or
an aunt (none of whom is legally liable for their maintenance)
require all this elaborate supervision and protection; whereas if
the children live with their own mother and father, with their
widowed mother, with their widower father, with any or all of
their grandparents, or exposed to the tender mercies of a father
and stepmother, no such supervision and protection is insisted on.
But although this is the rule, we are informed that the Central
Authority, in practice, now makes no difficulty, if applied to, in
sanctioning the transfer of children living with grandparents,
uncles and aunts, or brothers and sisters, from the category of
ordinary outdoor relief to the more regulated and more richly
endowed category of boarding-out. It still objects in the case of
parents (_Selections from the Correspondence of the Local
Government Board_, vol. iii. 1888, p. 187; _Decisions of the Local
Government Board_, 1903-4, by W. A. Casson, 1905, p. 78).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account