Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
[673] Local Government Board to Dr. Mortimer Glanville (_Lancet_
Memorial on Poor Law Medical Relief Reform), 12th November 1878;
in Eighth Annual Report, 1878-9, pp. 91-2. In spite of this
official answer, we may infer a certain internal conflict of
policy with regard to these salaried outdoor Poor Law nurses.
Though the Central Authority expressed itself as "desirous of
encouraging" the experiment, we cannot find that it issued the
Order, without which no board of guardians could create a new
salaried office, for nearly fourteen years. The District Nurses
Order, which was merely permissive, and which, therefore, could
not have been delayed merely because there were, in 1878, not
enough trained nurses to supply every union in the Kingdom, was
not issued until 27th January 1892 (Twenty-second Annual Report,
1892-3, pp. 12-13). We cannot find that any "paid nurses in the
treatment of the poor at their own homes" were sanctioned before
that date. Moreover, even then, it is difficult to feel sure that
the Central Authority was still, to use its words of 1878,
"desirous of encouraging this arrangement as much as possible." In
sending the Order to boards of guardians, it accompanied it by a
circular, which can scarcely be deemed encouraging. It was of
opinion that "it can only be under exceptional circumstances that
a sick pauper, whose illness is of such a character as to require
that the services of a nurse should be provided by the guardians,
can, with propriety, be relieved at home. At the same time it
appears ... that where circumstances render it desirable the
nurses employed in such attendance should be duly appointed
officers of the guardians, having recognised qualifications for
the position, and being subject in the performance of their duties
to the control of the guardians, and the Board have consequently
decided to empower boards of guardians to appoint such officers"
(Circular of 1st February 1892; in Twenty-second Annual Report,
1892-3, p. 9). Fifteen more years have elapsed; but we do not
gather that the experiment, which the Central Authority in 1878
was desirous of encouraging, has been very strenuously pressed by
the inspectors, or the power made publicly known. The result is
that we cannot find that it has yet taken shape even to the extent
of as many as a dozen salaried Poor Law nurses for the outdoor
sick from one end of the Kingdom to the other.
(ii.) _Institutional Treatment_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account