Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
[686] In 1889, for instance, the Central Authority provided that,
in cases of sudden or urgent necessity, the medical superintendent
or his assistant should admit patients on his own responsibility,
without order from the relieving officer (Special Order to Mile
End Old Town, 10th October 1889).
[687] Under the Metropolitan Poor Amendment Act 1870, the cost of
the maintenance of adult paupers in workhouses and sick asylums,
to the extent of 5d. per head per day, was thrown on the
Metropolitan Common Poor Fund. To two-thirds of the Metropolitan
unions, including all the poorer ones, this operated as a bribe in
favour of indoor (or infirmary) treatment as against domiciliary
or dispensary treatment. Mr. Longley wished to go much further. In
order practically to compel all the Metropolitan boards of
guardians to provide these elaborate and expensive hospitals, he
recommended that the whole cost of indoor maintenance of the sick,
when in infirmaries separated in position and administration from
the ordinary workhouses, should be made a charge on the
Metropolitan Common Poor Fund (Mr. Longley's Report on Indoor
Relief in the Metropolis, in Fourth Annual Report, 1874-5, p. 54).
[688] Memorandum on Nursing in Workhouse Sick Wards, April 1892;
in Twenty-fifth Annual Report, 1895-6, p. 114.
[689] Decision of Local Government Board in _Local Government
Chronicle_, 18th October 1902, p. 1051.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account