Great Britain. Royal Commission on Poor Laws and Relief of Distress; Poor -- Great Britain; Poor laws -- Great Britain
of mental faculty or mental desire, would consent to remain in the
workhouse a day longer than he could help. Hence it was a part of the
policy to avoid all obligatory detention, and to persist in regarding
the workhouse as a place of merely temporary sojourn, in which no
inmate, of whatever age, sex or condition, need be permanently
domiciled.
_K._--THE POSITION IN 1847 COMPARED WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF 1834
The proposals and recommendations of the Report of 1834 fall under five
heads, though opinions may differ as to the relative weight intended to
be given to each. These five heads are:--
(i.) That there should be national uniformity in the treatment of
each class of paupers, so that every applicant of any class might
receive identical treatment wherever he happened to reside.
(ii.) That outdoor relief to the able-bodied and their families
should be abolished--it being left ambiguous whether or not this
applied to any woman not legally dependent on an able-bodied man.
(iii.) That each local authority should have a workhouse in which
able-bodied applicants for relief should be received and set to
work under strict discipline, in order to test their destitution.
(iv.) That the condition of the able-bodied pauper should be less
eligible than that of the lowest class of independent labourer.
(v.) That, in so far as the aged and infirm or the children were
given indoor maintenance, this should be in separate institutions,
under distinct management, in which the old might "enjoy their
indulgences" and the children be educated by "a person properly
qualified to act as a schoolmaster."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account