English ways and by-ways : $b Being the letters of John and Ruth Dobson written from England to their friend, Leighton ParksParks, Leighton
General
English ways and by-ways : $b Being the letters of John and Ruth Dobson written from England to their friend, Leighton Parks
Parks, Leighton
Automobile travel -- Fiction; England -- Description and travel -- Fiction; Epistolary fiction
I had not cared to go to Llandidno, for it is the paradise of
trippers, but John the porter told me we ought not to miss it, so
thither we went. The sands were a sight never to be forgotten.
Hundreds of children were on the beach, the little ones laboriously
building houses, forts, and even towns--all of which the lapping sea
soon licked up. "Vanity of vanities," saith the preacher. But the
preacher knew nothing of children, else he would have said they were
the only wise ones. Their play is not "vanity," it is when men lose
the sense of proportion, and act as if things "seen" are eternal,
that vanity eats out the heart. These children were wise. They knew
their labor was but for a moment, and therefore did not weep, but
rather laughed, when the tongue of the sea touched their work and it
was gone. However you do not care to hear me moralize!
Surely no more beautiful children can be found in the world than
these English children. They may lack the vivacity of French and
American children, but, on the other hand, they are free from the
self-consciousness of the one and the febrile nervousness of the
other. They are superb little animals, which is what a child ought
to be. Those that I saw on the sands--and I suppose it is generally
true--had the supreme animal virtue, which is obedience. The babies
obeyed the nurses, the "middle-sized bears" obeyed the "big bears,"
and all obeyed--not as with us--the mother, but the father. For it
is the man who is the supreme court in England. One never hears the
familiar "Well, ask your mother!" And the result is a well-organized
feudal society, in which there is far more happiness than in many of
the so-called democratic, but really anarchistic, families that you
and I could name. In short, the family is a microcosm of that larger
life in which, some day, the children are to take their places.
When I imparted these reflections to Ruth, she said: "You have missed
the best."
"And what might that be, Madame Philosopher?" said I.
"If you had not set up to be a philosopher, yourself," she pertly
remarked, "you would have seen the obvious, which so many
philosophers overlook. It is the hair and the eyes of these children
that makes them so beautiful. Did you ever see such hair as these
girls have? It floats in the air like the corn-silk on an Indiana
farm! And look at the eyes of the boys; they are not blue as we
count blueness, but real blue, like the delphinium. I wonder if the
English reputation for truthfulness above other nations is not in
part due to the prevailing blue eyes? Who could doubt anything that
angel were to say?"
I looked at the "angel" in question, and laughed heartily at this
attempt to imitate Taine!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account