Ephemera Critica; Or, Plain Truths About Current LiteratureCollins, John Churton
History
Ephemera Critica; Or, Plain Truths About Current Literature
Collins, John Churton
Criticism; English literature -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
simplicity, chastity and propriety of his style, in his exquisite
responsiveness to all that appeals to the senses and the emotions, in
his ardent and abounding vitality. But, in his enthusiasm for nature, in
the intensity of his domestic affections, and in his occasional touches
of moral earnestness--and we have seldom to go far for them--he was
Roman. His sketches from nature are delightful. What could be more
perfect than the following? Has even Tennyson equalled it?--
Hic, qualis flatu placidum mare matutino
Horrificans Zephyrus proclivas incitat undas,
Aurorâ exoriente, vagi sub lumina solis;
Quæ tarde primum clementi flamine pulsæ
Procedunt, leviterque sonant plangore cachinni:
Post, vento crescente, magis magis increbescunt,
Purpureâque procul nantes a luce refulgent.
“As in early morning when Zephyr’s breath, ruffling the stilly
sea, stirs it into slanting waves up against the glow of the
travelling sun; and at first, while the impelling breeze is
gentle, they move in slow procession, and the plash of their
ripples is not loud; but then, as the breeze freshens, they
crowd faster and faster on, and far out at sea, as they float,
flash back the splendour of the crimsoning day in their front.”
Or, again, in the epistle to Manlius--
Qualis in aerii _pellucens_ vertice montis
Rivus _muscoso prosilit e lapide_.
How vivid is the picture of the rising sun and of early morning in the
Attis, 39-41.
Ubi oris aurei sol radiantibus oculis
Lustravit æthera album, sola dura, mare ferum,
Pepulitque noctis umbras vegetis sonipedibus.
In his “Asian Myrtle, in all the beauty of its blossom-laden branches,
which the Wood-Nymphs feed with honey dew to be their toy:”--
Floridis velut enitens
Myrtus Asia ramulis,
Quos Hamadryades Deæ
Ludicrum sibi roscido
Nutriunt humore.--
--who does not recognise Matthew Arnold’s “natural magic”?
Flowers he loved, as Shakespeare loved them. What tenderness there is in
the image of the love that perished--
Prati
Ultimi flos, prætereunte postquam
Tactus aratro est,
(xi. 19-21.)
--in the beautiful simile, so often imitated in every language in
Europe, where the unmarried maiden is compared to the uncropped flower,
lxii., 39-45; or where in the
Alba parthenice,
Luteumve papaver,
(lxi. 194-5.)
he sees the symbol of maidenhood; or where Ariadne is compared to the
myrtles on the banks of the Eurotas, and to the “flowers of diverse hues
which the spring breezes evoke”; and, again, the exquisite simile
picturing the husband’s love binding fast the bride’s thoughts, as a
tree is entwined in the clinging clasp of the gadding ivy--
Mentem amore revinciens,
Ut tenax hedera huc et huc
Arborem implicat errans.
Then we have the garland of Priapus with its felicitous epithets (xix.,
xx.).
It may be said of Catullus as Shelley said of his Alastor--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account