Ephemera Critica; Or, Plain Truths About Current LiteratureCollins, John Churton
History
Ephemera Critica; Or, Plain Truths About Current Literature
Collins, John Churton
Criticism; English literature -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
His theology, indeed, in its application to life, seems to resolve
itself into the recognition of universal law, divinely appointed,
immutable, inexorable, ubiquitous, controlling the physical world,
controlling the moral world, vindicating itself in the smallest facts of
life, and in the most stupendous convulsions of nature and society. In
morals it is maintained by the observance of the mean on the one hand,
and the due fulfilment of duty and obligation on the other. In politics
it is maintained by the subordination of the individual to the state,
and of the state to the higher law. Hooker says of Law, that as her
voice is the harmony of the world, so her seat is the bosom of God. The
Law Shakespeare recognises; of the Law-giver he is silent. As he is dumb
before the mystery of death, so is he equally reticent in the face of
that other mystery. He has nothing of the anthropomorphism of the Old
Testament, of the Homeric poems, and of Milton. Nor has he ever
expressed himself as Goethe has done in the famous passage in _Faust_,
beginning: “Wer darf ihn nennen.” In two important respects he seems to
differ from the Christian conception. He represents no miraculous
interpositions of Providence, no suspension of natural laws in favour of
the righteous, and to the detriment of the wicked. He is too reverend to
say with Goethe, that man, so far as direction in action goes, is
practically his own divinity. But he does say and represent--and that
repeatedly--what is expressed in such passages as these:--
Our remedies oft in ourselves do lie
Which we ascribe to Heaven: the fated sky
Gives us full scope.
_All’s Well that Ends Well._
Men at some time are masters of their fate.
_Julius Cæsar._
Omission to do what is necessary
Seals a commission to a blank of danger.
_Troilus and Cressida._
And we have no right to expect that Providence will cancel it. If deeds
do not go with prayer, prayer is not likely to be of much avail. So the
Bishop of Carlisle in _Richard II._:--
The means that Heaven yields must be embrac’d
And not neglected; else if Heaven would
And we will not, Heav’n’s offer we refuse:--
while the words which he puts into the mouth of Leonine in _Pericles_
are, we feel, significant:--
Pray: but be not tedious,
For the Gods are quick of ear, and I am sworn
To do my work with haste.
He has no sympathy with pious recluses. He has depicted no saint or
religious enthusiast, or written a line to indicate that he had any
respect for their ideals. With him,--
Spirits are not finely touched
But to fine issues.
They say best men are moulded out of faults,
And, for the most, become much more the better
For being a little bad.
Most subject is the fattest soil to weeds
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account