Epic and Romance: Essays on Medieval LiteratureKer, W. P. (William Paton)
History
Epic and Romance: Essays on Medieval Literature
Ker, W. P. (William Paton)
Epic poetry -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Romances -- History and criticism
A hundred years after Chrestien, one of his cleverest pupils wrote the
Provençal story of _Flamenca_,[88] a work in which the form of the
novel is completely disengaged from the unnecessary accidents of
romance, and reaches a kind of positive and modern clearness very much
at variance in some respects with popular ideas of what is medieval.
The Romance of the medieval Romantic School attains one of its highest
and most distinctive points in _Flamenca_, and shows what it had been
aiming at from the beginning--namely, the expression in an elegant
manner of the ideas of the _Art of Love_, as understood in the polite
society of those times. _Flamenca_ is nearly contemporary with the
_Roman de la Rose_ of Guillaume de Lorris. Its inspiring ideas are the
same, and though its influence on succeeding authors is
indiscernible, where that of the _Roman de la Rose_ is widespread and
enduring, _Flamenca_ would have as good a claim to be considered a
representative masterpiece of medieval literature, if it were not that
it appears to be breaking loose from medieval conventions where the
_Roman de la Rose_ makes all it can out of them. _Flamenca_ is a
simple narrative of society, with the indispensable three
characters--the husband, the lady, and the lover. The scene of the
story is principally at the baths of Bourbon, in the then present day;
and of the miracles and adventures of the more marvellous and
adventurous romances there is nothing left but the very pleasant
enumeration of the names of favourite stories in the account of the
minstrelsy at Flamenca's wedding. The author knew all that was to be
known in romance, of Greek, Latin, or British invention--Thebes and
Troy, Alexander and Julius Caesar, Samson and Judas Maccabeus, Ivain
and Gawain and Perceval, Paris and Tristram, and all Ovid's _Legend of
Good Women_--but out of all these studies he has retained only what
suited his purpose. He does not compete with the Greek or the British
champions in their adventures among the romantic forests. Chrestien of
Troyes is his master, but he does not try to copy the magic of the
Lady of the Fountain, or the Bridge of the Sword, or the Castle of the
Grail. He follows the doctrine of love expounded in Chrestien's
_Lancelot_, but his hero is not sent wandering at random, and is not
made to display his courtly emotions among the ruins and shadows of
the lost Celtic mythology, like Lancelot in Chrestien's poem. The life
described in _Flamenca_ is the life of the days in which it was
composed; and the hero's task is to disguise himself as a clerk, so as
to get a word with the jealously-guarded lady in church on Sundays,
while giving her the Psalter to kiss after the Mass. _Flamenca_, is
really the triumph of Ovid, with the _Art of Love_, over all his
Gothic competitors out of the fairy tales. The Provençal poet has
discarded everything but the essential dominant interests, and in so
doing has gone ahead of his master Chrestien, who (except in _Cliges_)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account