Epic and Romance: Essays on Medieval LiteratureKer, W. P. (William Paton)
History
Epic and Romance: Essays on Medieval Literature
Ker, W. P. (William Paton)
Epic poetry -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Romances -- History and criticism
Boccaccio took up this story, from the Latin version of the Tale of
Troy, the _Historia Trojana_ of Guido. His _Filostrato_ is written on
a different plan from the _Teseide_; it is one of his best works. He
did not make it into an epic poem; the _Filostrato_, Boccaccio's
_Troilus and Cressida_, is a romance, differing from the older French
romantic form not in the design of the story, but in the new poetical
diction in which it is composed, and its new poetical ideas. There is
no false classicism in it, as there is in his _Palamon and Arcita_; it
is a novel of his own time, a story of the _Decameron_, only written
at greater length, and in verse. Chaucer, the "great translator," took
Boccaccio's poem and treated it in his own way, not as he had dealt
with the _Teseide_. The _Teseide_, because there was some romantic
improbability in the story, he made into a romance. The story of
Troilus he saw was strong enough to bear a stronger handling, and
instead of leaving it a romance, graceful and superficial as it is in
Boccaccio, he deepened it and filled it with such dramatic imagination
and such variety of life as had never been attained before his time by
any romancer; and the result is a piece of work that leaves all
romantic convention behind. The _Filostrato_ of Boccaccio is a story
of light love, not much more substantial, except in its new poetical
language, than the story of _Flamenca_. In Chaucer the passion of
Troilus is something different from the sentiment of romance; the
changing mind of Cressida is represented with an understanding of the
subtlety and the tragic meaning of that life which is "Time's fool."
Pandarus is the other element. In Boccaccio he is a personage of the
same order as Troilus and Cressida; they all might have come out of
the Garden of the _Decameron_, and there is little to choose between
them. Chaucer sets him up with a character and a philosophy of his
own, to represent the world outside of romance. The Comic Genius
claims a share in the tragedy, and the tragedy makes room for him,
because the tragic personages, "Tragic Comedians" as they are, can
bear the strain of the contrast. The selection of personages and
motives is made in another way in the romantic schools, but this poem
of Chaucer's is not romance. It is the fulfilment of the prophecy of
Socrates, just before Aristophanes and the tragic poet had to be put
to bed at the end of the _Symposium_, that the best author of tragedy
is the best author of comedy also. It is the freedom of the
imagination, beyond all the limits of partial and conventional forms.
NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS
APPENDIX
NOTE A (p. 133)
_Rhetoric of the Western and Northern Alliterative Poems_
Any page of the Anglo-Saxon poets, and of the "Elder Edda," will show
the difference between the "continuous" and the "discrete"--the
Western and the Northern--modes of the alliterative verse. It may be
convenient to select some passages here for reference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account