Three clinical types of pneumococcus pneumonia following influenza occurred: lobar pneumonia, lobar pneumonia with purulent bronchitis, and bronchopneumonia. Lobar pneumonia was usually sudden in onset and ran the characteristic course of the primary disease. Lobar pneumonia with purulent bronchitis similarly ran the characteristic course of the primary disease but presented the unusual picture of lobar pneumonia with mucopurulent rather than rusty, tenacious sputum and numerous moist râles throughout the unconsolidated portions of the lungs. The cases of bronchopneumonia ran a very variable course from mild cases of a few days’ duration and meager signs of consolidation to rapidly progressive cases with signs of extensive pulmonary involvement. Purulent bronchitis was very frequently associated with bronchopneumonia. Hemolytic streptococcus pneumonia following influenza presented the clinical picture of bronchopneumonia and was not readily distinguished on clinical grounds from pneumococcus bronchopneumonia except in those cases which developed a pleural exudate early in the disease. The advent of tertiary infection of the lower respiratory tract with hemolytic streptococci in cases of secondary pneumococcus pneumonia presented no symptoms sufficiently constant or certain to make clinical diagnosis easy. The development of empyema in pneumococcus bronchopneumonia usually meant streptococcus infection. Pure B. influenzæ pneumonia, if such cases existed, presented no diagnostic features by which it could be distinguished from pneumococcus bronchopneumonia following influenza. It was impossible to determine on clinical and bacteriologic grounds alone what part the prevalent influenza bacilli played in the causation of the actual pneumonia. Discussion That wide variations in the conception of influenza have arisen during the recent pandemic, even a hasty review of the literature makes clear. In its essence this divergence of opinion seems to depend upon whether pneumonia is considered an essential part of influenza or a complication due either to the primary cause of influenza or to secondary infection. One extreme is expressed by Dunn[30] who says “the so-called complication is the disease,” the other by Fantus[31] who finds influenza a relatively mild disease with pneumonia a relatively infrequent and largely preventable complication.