Perhaps a simpler plan would have been to forbid the erection of a
statue to any public man or woman till he or she had been dead at least
one hundred years, and even then to insist on reconsideration of the
claims of the deceased and the merit of the statue every fifty
years—but the working of the Act brought about results that on the
whole were satisfactory. For in the first place, many public statues
that would have been voted under the old system, were not ordered, when
it was known that they would be almost certainly broken up after fifty
years, and in the second, public sculptors knowing their work to be so
ephemeral, scamped it to an extent that made it offensive even to the
most uncultured eye. Hence before long subscribers took to paying the
sculptor for the statue of their dead statesmen, on condition that he
did not make it. The tribute of respect was thus paid to the deceased,
the public sculptors were not mulcted, and the rest of the public
suffered no inconvenience.
I was told, however, that an abuse of this custom is growing up,
inasmuch as the competition for the commission not to make a statue is
so keen, that sculptors have been known to return a considerable part
of the purchase money to the subscribers, by an arrangement made with
them beforehand. Such transactions, however, are always clandestine. A
small inscription is let into the pavement, where the public statue
would have stood, which informs the reader that such a statue has been
ordered for the person, whoever he or she may be, but that as yet the
sculptor has not been able to complete it. There has been no Act to
repress statues that are intended for private consumption, but as I
have said, the custom is falling into desuetude.
Returning to Erewhonian customs in connection with death, there is one
which I can hardly pass over. When any one dies, the friends of the
family write no letters of condolence, neither do they attend the
scattering, nor wear mourning, but they send little boxes filled with
artificial tears, and with the name of the sender painted neatly upon
the outside of the lid. The tears vary in number from two to fifteen or
sixteen, according to degree of intimacy or relationship; and people
sometimes find it a nice point of etiquette to know the exact number
which they ought to send. Strange as it may appear, this attention is
highly valued, and its omission by those from whom it might be expected
is keenly felt. These tears were formerly stuck with adhesive plaster
to the cheeks of the bereaved, and were worn in public for a few months
after the death of a relative; they were then banished to the hat or
bonnet, and are now no longer worn.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account