Mrs. Nosnibor went on to say that I must not think there was any want
of confidence in the bank because I had seen so few people there; the
heart of the country was thoroughly devoted to these establishments,
and any sign of their being in danger would bring in support from the
most unexpected quarters. It was only because people knew them to be so
very safe, that in some cases (as she lamented to say in Mr.
Nosnibor’s) they felt that their support was unnecessary. Moreover
these institutions never departed from the safest and most approved
banking principles. Thus they never allowed interest on deposit, a
thing now frequently done by certain bubble companies, which by doing
an illegitimate trade had drawn many customers away; and even the
shareholders were fewer than formerly, owing to the innovations of
these unscrupulous persons, for the Musical Banks paid little or no
dividend, but divided their profits by way of bonus on the original
shares once in every thirty thousand years; and as it was now only two
thousand years since there had been one of these distributions, people
felt that they could not hope for another in their own time and
preferred investments whereby they got some more tangible return; all
which, she said, was very melancholy to think of.
Having made these last admissions, she returned to her original
statement, namely, that every one in the country really supported these
banks. As to the fewness of the people, and the absence of the
able-bodied, she pointed out to me with some justice that this was
exactly what we ought to expect. The men who were most conversant about
the stability of human institutions, such as the lawyers, men of
science, doctors, statesmen, painters, and the like, were just those
who were most likely to be misled by their own fancied accomplishments,
and to be made unduly suspicious by their licentious desire for greater
present return, which was at the root of nine-tenths of the opposition;
by their vanity, which would prompt them to affect superiority to the
prejudices of the vulgar; and by the stings of their own conscience,
which was constantly upbraiding them in the most cruel manner on
account of their bodies, which were generally diseased.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account