Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His SonButler, Samuel
Philosophy
Erewhon Revisited Twenty Years Later, Both by the Original Discoverer of the Country and by His Son
Butler, Samuel
Satire; Utopian fiction; Utopias -- Fiction
“Some, indeed, among them have maintained that birth is not the death
which they commonly deem it, but that there is a life beyond the womb
of which they as yet know nothing, and which is a million fold more
truly life than anything they have yet been able even to imagine. But
the greater number shake their yet unfashioned heads and say they have
no evidence for this that will stand a moment’s examination.
“‘Nay,’ answer the others, ‘so much work, so elaborate, so wondrous as
that whereon we are now so busily engaged must have a purpose, though
the purpose is beyond our grasp.’
“‘Never,’ reply the first speakers; ‘our pleasure in the work is
sufficient justification for it. Who has ever partaken of this life
you speak of, and re-entered into the womb to tell us of it? Granted
that some few have pretended to have done this, but how completely
have their stories broken down when subjected to the tests of sober
criticism. No. When we are born we are born, and there is an end of
us.’
“But in the hour of birth, when they can no longer re-enter the womb
and tell the others, Behold! they find that it is not so.”
Here the reader again closed his book and resumed his place in the apse.
CHAPTER XVI: PROFESSOR HANKY PREACHES A SERMON, IN THE COURSE OF WHICH MY
FATHER DECLARES HIMSELF TO BE THE SUNCHILD
Professor Hanky then went up into the pulpit, richly but soberly robed in
vestments the exact nature of which I cannot determine. His carriage was
dignified, and the harsh lines on his face gave it a strong
individuality, which, though it did not attract, conveyed an impression
of power that could not fail to interest. As soon as he had given
attention time to fix itself upon him, he began his sermon without text
or preliminary matter of any kind, and apparently without notes.
He spoke clearly and very quietly, especially at the beginning; he used
action whenever it could point his meaning, or give it life and colour,
but there was no approach to staginess or even oratorical display. In
fact, he spoke as one who meant what he was saying, and desired that his
hearers should accept his meaning, fully confident in his good faith. His
use of pause was effective. After the word “mistake,” at the end of the
opening sentence, he held up his half-bent hand and paused for full three
seconds, looking intently at his audience as he did so. Every one felt
the idea to be here enounced that was to dominate the sermon.
The sermon--so much of it as I can find room for--was as follows:-
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account