Error's chains : $b How forged and broken : A comparative history of the national, social and religious errors that mankind has fallen into and practised from the creation down to the present time.Dobbins, Frank S. (Frank Stockton)
Religion
Error's chains : $b How forged and broken : A comparative history of the national, social and religious errors that mankind has fallen into and practised from the creation down to the present time.
Dobbins, Frank S. (Frank Stockton)
Idols and images -- Worship; Mythology; Religions
The supreme god, the first and sole principle from whom all other
deities were derived, was Ilu, whose name signifies God _par
excellence_. Their idea of him was too comprehensive, too vast,
to have any determined external form, or consequently to receive in
general the adoration of the people; and from this point of view there
is a certain analogy between Ilu and the Chronos of the Greeks, with
whom he was compared by the latter. In Chaldæa it does not seem that
any temple was ever specially dedicated to him; but at Nineveh and
generally throughout Assyria, he seems to have received the peculiarly
national name of Asshur (whence was derived the name of the country,
_Mat Asshur_), and this itself seems related to the Arian name of
the deity _Asura_. With this title he was great god of the land,
the especial protector of the Assyrians, he who gave victory to their
arms. The inscriptions designate him as “Master or Chief of the Gods.”
He it is, perhaps, who is to be recognized in the figure occasionally
found on the Assyrian monuments (but probably adopted in later times
by the Persians to represent their Ormuzd), representing a human bust,
wearing the royal tiara in the middle of a circle borne by two large
eagle wings, and with an eagle’s tail.
THE ASSYRIAN TRIAD.
Below Ilu, the universal and mysterious source of all, was placed a
triad, composed of his three first external and visible manifestations,
and occupying the summit of the hierarchy of gods in popular worship.
Anu, the Oannes of the Greek writers, was the lord of darkness; Bel,
the demiurgus, the organizer of the world; Ao, called also Bin, that
is, the divine “Son” _par excellence_, the divine light, the
intelligence penetrating, directing and vivifying the universe. These
three divine persons esteemed as equal in power and con-substantial,
were not held as of the same degree of emanation, but were regarded as
having, on the contrary, issued the one from the other--Ao from Oannes,
and Bel from Ao. Oannes, the “Lord of the Lower World, the Lord of
Darkness,” was represented on the monuments under the strange figure
of a man with an eagle’s tail, and for his head-dress an enormous
fish, whose open mouth rises over his head, while the body covers his
shoulders. It is under this form that, Berosus tells us, according
to Babylonian tradition, he floated on the surface of the waters of
Chaos. Bel, the “Father of the Gods,” was usually represented under an
entirely human form, attired as a king, wearing a tiara with bull’s
horns, the symbol of power. But this god took many other secondary
forms, the most important being Bel Dagon, a human bust springing from
the body of a fish. We do not know exactly the typical figure of Ao
or Bin, “the intelligent guide, the Lord of the visible world, the
Lord of knowledge, of glory and light.” The serpent seems to have been
his principal symbol; though some other sculptured figures seem to be
intended to represent Bin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account