English literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
Of all great writers since Scott, Dickens is probably the man to whom the
world owes most gratitude. No other has caused so many sad hearts to be
lifted up in laughter; no other has added so much mirth to the toilsome
and perplexed life of men, of poor and rich, of learned and unlearned. "A
vast hope has passed across the world," says Alfred de Musset; we may say
that with Dickens a happy smile, a joyous laugh, went round this earth.
To have made us laugh so frequently, so inextinguishably, so kindly--that
is his great good deed. It will be said, and with a great deal of truth,
that he has purged us with pity and terror as well as with laughter. But
it is becoming plain that his command of tears is less assured than of
old, and I cannot honestly regret that some of his pathos--not all, by
any means--is losing its charm and its certainty of appeal. Dickens's
humour was rarely too obvious; it was essentially personal, original,
quaint, unexpected, and his own. His pathos was not infrequently derived
from sources open to all the world, and capable of being drawn from by
very commonplace writers. Little Nells and Dombeys, children unhappy,
overthrown early in the _melee_ of the world, and dying among weeping
readers, no longer affect us as they affected another generation. Mrs.
Beecher Stowe and the author of "Misunderstood," once made some people
weep like anything by these simple means. Ouida can do it; plenty of
people can do it. Dickens lives by virtue of what none but he can do: by
virtue of Sairey Gamp, and Sam Weller, and Dick Swiveller, and Mr.
Squeers, with a thousand other old friends, of whom we can never weary.
No more than Cleopatra's can custom stale _their_ infinite variety.
I do not say that Dickens' pathos is always of the too facile sort, which
plays round children's death-beds. Other pathos he has, more fine and
not less genuine. It may be morbid and contemptible to feel "a great
inclination to cry" over David Copperfield's boyish infatuation for
Steerforth; but I feel it. Steerforth was a "tiger,"--as Major Pendennis
would have said, a tiger with his curly hair and his ambrosial whiskers.
But when a little boy loses his heart to a big boy he does not think of
this. Traddles thought of it. "Shame, J. Steerforth!" cried Traddles,
when Steerforth bullied the usher. Traddles had not lost his heart, nor
set up the big boy as a god in the shrine thereof. But boys do these
things; most of us have had our Steerforths--tall, strong, handsome,
brave, good-humoured. Far off across the years I see the face of such an
one, and remember that emotion which is described in "David Copperfield,"
chap. xix., towards the end of the chapter. I don't know any other
novelist who has touched this young and absolutely disinterested belief
of a little boy in a big one--touched it so kindly and seriously, that is
there is a hint of it in "Dr. Birch's School Days."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account