Essays in Zen Buddhism : $b First seriesSuzuki, Daisetz Teitaro
Religion
Essays in Zen Buddhism : $b First series
Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro
Zen Buddhism
“Pure and immaculate is the nature of all sentient beings;
From the very beginning there is no birth, no death;
This body, this mind—a phantom creation it is;
And in phantom transformation there are neither sins nor
merits.[4.11]
When the Buddha belonging to the present age ordered Mahākāśyapa to
be the orthodox transmitter of the Good Law, he uttered the following
verse:
“The Dharma is ultimately a dharma which is no-dharma;
A dharma which is no-dharma is also a dharma:
As I now hand this no-dharma over to thee,
What we call the Dharma, the Dharma—where after all is the
Dharma?”[f78][4.12]
The sixth patriarch Dhṛtaka has:
“Penetrate into the ultimate truth of mind,
And we have neither things nor no-things;
Enlightened and not-enlightened—they are the same;
Neither mind nor thing there is.”[4.13]
The twenty-second patriarch, Manura, gave his view thus:
“The mind moveth with the ten thousand things:
Even when moving, it is serene.
Perceive its essence as it moveth on,
And neither joy nor sorrow there is.”[4.14]
In these gāthās we notice the teaching generally characteristic of
Mahayana Buddhism as it prevailed in India. As I said before, as far
as the doctrinal side of Buddhism was concerned, Zen had nothing
particularly to offer as its own; for its _raison d’être_ consists
in its being a spiritual experience and not in its being a special
system of philosophy or of certain dogmas conceptually synthesised. We
have Zen only when the Mahayana Buddhist speculation is reduced
to the actual things of life and becomes the direct expression of
one’s inner life. And this did not come to pass until Buddhism was
transplanted into China and made there to grow nourished by a people
whose practical turn of mentality refused to swallow the Indian
tradition undigested. The form of thought as adopted in the so-called
patriarchal verses did not appeal to the Chinese mind. When they got
into the thought itself, they wished to express it in their own way,
they wished to live the thought as was natural to them, and not to
hoard it as something imported from abroad and not inherently belonging
to their psychology.
When Bodhi-Dharma gave his full sanction to his disciples, he is
supposed to have composed the following gāthā:
“The original reason of my coming to this country
Was to transmit the Law in order to save the confused:
One flower with five petals is unfolded,
And the bearing of fruit will by itself come.”[4.15]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account