Essays on the Constitution of the United States: Published during its Discussion by the People, 1787-1788
History
Essays on the Constitution of the United States: Published during its Discussion by the People, 1787-1788
Constitutional history -- United States -- Sources; United States. Constitution
I will not say this writer makes a distinction between a thing done
in convention and a thing done in committee. Be this as it may, he
confesses more than Mr. Martin; for it seems that Mr. Gerry proposed
that “the public debt should stand on the same ground it now stands
on by the articles of confederation.” He might have subjoined that
Mr. Gerry prefaced this motion by observing that it was the same in
substance as his first, in as much as it included his first. But
notwithstanding this motion was readily agreed to without his
explanation being contradicted, yet he never afterwards favoured the
convention with a look of peace, or a word of reconcilement.
50 The convention of New Hampshire had met on the 13 of June, and after
a discussion of seven days, had adjourned without voting upon the
constitution.—_Ed._
51 See Letter of William Williams in this Collection.—_Ed._
52 This is a paraphrase of the arguments of “The Centinel” in _The
Independent Gazetteer_.—ED.
53 An attempt had been made in Congress, by the friends of the new
government, for Congress to recommend its acceptance, but this
produced protest from those opposed to it, and threats of an appeal
to the people, so in order to prevent such action a compromise was
eventually made, by which it was merely unanimously “transmitted to
the several legislatures.”—_Ed._
54 A series of articles in the _New York Journal_, written by Robert
Yates.—_Ed._
55 John Smilie, a prominent Anti-Federalist.—_Ed._
56 William Livingston.—_Ed._
57 See _Ante_, pages 182 and 189.—_Ed._
58 The Maryland Delegates to the Federal Convention were required by
the legislature to report the proceedings of that body to them, and
it was in this connection that Martin’s _Genuine Information_ was
prepared.—_Ed._
59 According to this idea, I endeavored to obtain as an amendment to
the system the following clause: “And whenever the legislature of
the United States shall find it necessary that revenue shall be
raised by direct taxation, having apportioned the same by the above
rule, requisitions shall be made of the respective states to pay
into the continental treasury their respective quotas within a time
in the said requisition to be specified, and in case of any of the
states failing to comply with such requisition, then, and then only,
to have power to devise and pass acts directing the mode, and
authorizing the same in the state failing therein.” This was
rejected, and that power, which I wished to have given the
government only in this particular instance, is given to it without
any restraint or limitation in every case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account