[357]B. E. Perry, _op. cit._, pp. 52-55. [358]M. Croiset, _op. cit._, p. 48. [359]Harmon, _op. cit._, V, 101-207. [360]M. Rostovtzeff, _Seminarium Kondakovianum_, II, 135-38, Prague, 1928; _Papyri Greci e Latini_, VIII. No. 981. For a different point of view see F. Zimmermann, “Lukians Toxaris und das Kairener Romanfragment” in _Philologische Wochenschrift_, 55 (1935), 1211-16. [361]R. M. Rattenbury, “Romance: the Greek Novel” in _New Chapters in the History of Greek Literature, Third Series_, pp. 240-44. [362]M. Rostovtzeff, _Scythien und der Bosporus_, Berlin, 1931, I, 96-99. [363]M. Croiset, _op. cit._, p. 51. [364]Quis ille? _Met._ I. 1. [365]E. H. Haight, _Apuleius and his Influence_, New York, 1927; “The Myth of Cupid and Psyche in Ancient Art” in _Art and Archaeology_, III (1916), 43-52, 87-97; “The Myth of Cupid and Psyche in Renaissance Art,” “The Vassar College Psyche Tapestries,” in _Art and Archaeology_, XV (1923), 107-116; “Apuleius’ Art of Story-Telling” in _Essays on Ancient Fiction_, New York, 1936. [366]From E. H. Haight, “Apuleius’ Art of Story-Telling,” in _Essays on Ancient Fiction_, New York, 1936, p. 152. [367]_Met._ XI, 23. [368]Hermann Riefstahl, _Der Roman des Apuleius_, Frankfurt am Main, 1938, pp. 83-84. [369]Riefstahl, _op. cit._, p. 85. [370]For an account of Aristides and the Milesian Tales see L. C. Purser, _The Story of Cupid and Psyche as related by Apuleius_, London, 1910, Excursus I. [371]_Apologia_, 55, 56. [372]Riefstahl, _op. cit._, pp. 84-85. [373]_Met._ XI. 22. [374]S. Gaselee, _Apuleius the Golden Ass being the Metamorphoses of Lucius Apuleius_, in _The Loeb Classical Library_, XI. 4. [375]For Riefstahl’s whole theory of “Apuleius und die griechischen Liebesromane” see _op. cit._, pp. 82-95. [376]See the review of Riefstahl’s work by H. W. Prescott in _A.J.P._, 61 (1940), pp. 115-17. [377]To complete the list of different types of novels, we might add the realistic novel of low life, Petronius’ _Satyricon_. Since its affiliations are with the Menippean satire and not with the Greek Romances, I have omitted any study of it here. See E. H. Haight, _Apuleius and his Influence_, pp. 7-8; “Satire and the Latin Novel” in _Essays on Ancient Fiction_, pp. 86-120. For a recent review of the literature about the _Satyricon_ and a brilliant re-interpretation of it see Gilbert Highet “Petronius the Moralist” in _T.P.A.P.A._, LXXII (1941), 176-94. [378]M. Rostovtzeff, _A History of the Ancient World, Volume II. Rome_, Oxford, 1927, pp. 239-41. Yet see pp. 181-85 for Rostovtzeff’s knowledge of the Greek Romances. INDEX