Essays on the Microscope: Containing a Practical Description of the Most Improved Microscopes, a General History of Insects, etc., etc.Adams, George
Science
Essays on the Microscope: Containing a Practical Description of the Most Improved Microscopes, a General History of Insects, etc., etc.
Adams, George
Insects -- Early works to 1800; Microscopy -- Early works to 1800
3. That no insect in its perfect state, or after it has gone through all
its transformations, has less than six legs, though many have more.
There are some moths, whose two fore feet are so small, as scarcely to
entitle them to that name.
4. That insects have neither the organs of smell nor hearing; at least
they have not as yet been discovered, though it is reported that
Fabricius has lately found and described the organs of hearing in a
lobster.[61]
[61] That many insects are susceptible of a shrill or loud noise, is a
fact so well ascertained, as to be indisputable; but in what manner,
or by what organs the sensation is conveyed, is not so evident;
Barbut, however, supposes them to possess the sense of hearing in a
very distinct manner. Many insects, he observes, are well known to be
endued with the power of uttering sounds, viz. large beetles, bees,
wasps, common flies, gnats, &c. The sphinx atropos squeaks, when hurt,
nearly as loud as a mouse: this faculty certainly must be intended for
some purpose, and as they vary their cry occasionally, it appears
designed to give notice of pleasure or pain, or some affection in the
creature which possesses it. “The knowledge of their sounds,” says he,
“is undoubtedly confined to their tribe, and is a language
intelligible to them only; saving when violence obliges the animal to
exert the voice of nature in distress, craving compassion; then all
animals understand the doleful cry; for instance, attack a bee or wasp
near the hive or nest, or a few of them; the consequence will be, the
animal or animals, by a different tone of voice will express his or
their disapprobation or pain; that sound is known to the hive to be
plaintive, and that their brother or brethren require their
assistance, and the offending party seldom escapes with impunity. Now,
if they had not the sense of hearing, they could not have known the
danger their brother or brethren were in, by the alteration of their
tone.” Another proof, which he reckons still more decisive, was taken
from his observation on a spider, which had made a very large web on a
wooden railing, and was at the time in a cavity behind one of the
rails, at a considerable distance from the part where a fly had
entangled himself; the spider became immediately sensible of it,
though, from the situation of the rail, he could not possibly have
seen the fly. This observation, however, cannot be considered as
conclusive, as it is very probable that the spider was alarmed by the
tremulous motion of the threads of the web occasioned by the
fluttering of the fly, which he might well know how to distinguish
from their vibration by the wind. It is this author’s opinion, that
the organ of hearing is situated in the antennæ; he likewise supposes
that the organs of smell reside in the palpi or feelers. For his
reasoning on these subjects, see the Genera Insectorum, Preface, p.
vii. & seq. EDIT.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account