Aristotle, speaking of insects with many feet, expresses himself nearly in the same manner; without naming the particular creatures to which he alludes, he observes, that there are of these animals or insects, as well as of plants and trees, some that propagate themselves by shoots; and, as what were but the parts of a tree before, become thus distinct and separate trees; so, in cutting one of these animals, the pieces which before composed altogether but one animal, become suddenly so many distinct individuals. And he adds, that the soul in these insects is in effect but one, though multiplied in its powers, as it is in plants. Aristot. de Histor. Animal. tom. 1, lib. 4, cap. 7, pag. 824, & de Part. Animal. lib. 4, tom. 1, cap. 6, pag. 1029. &c. This will suffice to shew that the ancients were not entirely unacquainted with the subject before us; though it does not derogate from the merit of Leeuwenhoeck, Trembley, and other ingenious naturalists, by whose assiduous and patient investigations we have obtained a more perfect knowledge of this astonishing class of animated beings. EDIT. Though natural history is so fruitful in extraordinary facts, it has hitherto produced none so singular as the various properties of the different species of the hydra. I shall endeavour, first, to trace the progress of this discovery, in which we shall see with what sage caution and accuracy Trembley, and other naturalists examined this wonderful phænomenon, and what accumulated evidence was judged necessary to establish the fact. We find M. Trembley writing in January, 1741, to M. Bonnet, that he did not know whether he should call the object which then engaged his attention, a plant or an animal. “I have studied it,” says he, “ever since June last, and have found in it striking characteristics of both plant and animal. It is a little aquatic being. At first sight, every one imagines it to be a plant; but if it be a plant, it is sensitive and ambulant; if it be an animal, it may be propagated by slips or cuttings, like many plants.” It was not till the month of March, in the same year, that he could satisfy himself as to their nature. When Reaumur saw, for the first time, two polypes formed from one that he had divided into two parts, he could hardly believe his eyes; and even after having repeated the operation an hundred times, and again examined it an hundred more, he says that the sight was not become familiar to him.