Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
History
Essays, or discourses, vol. 3 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
VIII. The vulgar opinion has represented this philosopher, as a poor
madman, and an extravagant buffoon, who passed his whole life in
continual bursts of laughter, and who by laughing at every thing, had
made himself the laughing-stock and derision of all mankind; and the
conclusion drawn from thence has been, that he was not less ignorant
than ridiculous. But notwithstanding this opinion has been so generally
adopted, it is easy to demonstrate, that Democritus in reality, was one
of the most thinking and enlightened men of antiquity. A proof of which,
was his application to study, his manner of living, the estimation he
was held in by his countrymen, and his vast learning and wisdom. All that
we are about to urge in his defence, is taken from the authorities of
Diogenes Laertius, Athenæus, Valerius Maximus, Cicero, and other writers
of eminence.
IX. His application to study was such, that he lived in an almost
continued state of seclusion from the world. He hardly ever stirred out
of his house; nor within it, did he scarce allow himself any respite from
his labours, but remained almost always shut up in his study, reading,
meditating, and writing. His ardent desire for acquiring more and more
lights and information, induced him to leave for a long time, not only
his retirement, but his country also, and to travel into distant nations,
in order to consult the learned men of Egypt, Persia, and Chaldea; and as
some say, even went to consult those of Ethiopia, and India likewise. He
expended in these peregrinations, all that he inherited from his father,
which amounted to a hundred talents. At his return to his own country,
he was accused before the magistrates, as a dissipater of his paternal
inheritance; which in that country, was looked upon as a serious offence,
and was punished, by depriving the spendthrift of being buried with his
ancestors, as an unworthy descendant of his family. The method Democritus
took to justify himself, was very singular. He produced to his judges,
the best book he had written, which was intitled, _The Great Diacosmus_,
and read to them a large portion of it, and pleaded, that the knowledge
contained in that book, was the fruit of his travels, and that he had
expended his paternal inheritance in acquiring it. The magistrates were
astonished at the profundity of the learning contained in the book,
and determined, that his money had been well expended in making the
acquisition; and not only acquitted Democritus of the charge that had
been brought against him, but adjudged that he should be rewarded with
five hundred talents, to be paid out of the public treasury, and adjudged
further, that statues should be erected to him as a most excellent man.
Let any one now consider, whether it is probable, that his country should
pay such honourable attention to a person, who was a ridiculous fellow,
and a buffoon? to say nothing of his being looked upon as a half madman,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account