Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LXXX. I am so far from believing, that the subtil matter is the _primum
mobile_, or first mover of every thing, that I am inclined to think, it
moves nothing. My reason for this opinion, is as follows. The more fluid
a matter is, so much the less impulse it makes on any body it encounters.
Thus we see, that water gives a much less violent shock to a wall, than
any other solid body of equal size, that may be forcibly driven against
it; and air, a much less than water. No building could stand against, or
resist a moderate gale of wind, if the air was as solid as water. The
subtil matter then, according to the doctrine of the Cartesians, being
infinitely fluid, can have but little impulse, or be able to impress but
little agitation or motion, on the bodies it encounters. This consequence
to me, is clear and plain; because, if in proportion to the augmentation
of its fluidity, the impulse of a body is lessened, when the fluidity
comes to be infinite, the impulse will cease totally. From hence it would
follow, that there is no body whatever, which could be moved by the
impulse of the subtil matter.
LXXXI. But admitting that it has power, as the Cartesians pretend, to
move the insensible particles of the mixtures; it will not follow
from thence, that it furnishes us with an explanation of the present
phenomenon. For in the first place, the subtil matter, if it has any
impulse, exercises it on the particles of the juice the instant that
it is pressed from the grape; and even perhaps did it before, while
the liquor was contained within the outside skin or covering. How then
does it happen, that it did not sooner excite that tumult, which is the
symptom and property of fermentation? Secondly, how can the acids and
alkalies be said to produce this effect? for, according to the doctrine
of the Cartesians, of whatever particles the mixtures consist, the subtil
matter would set them in motion, for that there is no mixture whatever,
impenetrable to its extreme subtilty. Thirdly, how can those exceeding
slow fermentations, which are years before they manifest themselves, as
in the instance of treacle, be attributed to the rapid and swift motion
of the subtil matter?
SECT. XXI.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account