Essays towards the history of paintingCallcott, Maria, Lady
History
Essays towards the history of painting
Callcott, Maria, Lady
Painting -- History
I have already shown the probable origin of painting, its earliest
application to the service of religion, and its use as a method
of recording events among some nations, before the invention of
alphabetical writing. While it was confined chiefly to the latter
purpose, it remained fixed, and incapable of improvement; but as soon
as alphabetical writing was either invented or adopted in any country,
the imitative arts became free, and improved in feeling, spirit, and
expression, as well as in execution.
While the Grecian states and cities were struggling for national
independence and civil freedom, the arts maintained a severe and almost
awful character, devoted exclusively to religion and patriotism. But
those great objects once attained, society became more polished; a
larger space was allotted to the exercise of the imagination. Various
sects of Philosophers sprang up: a new race of Poets arose; and the
arts losing part of their grandeur with their austerity, began to
partake of the blandishments of those luxurious times, that succeeded
to the great political struggles of the country.
Painting was capable of assisting the task of the moral teachers, by
her power of expressing passion. She illustrated the dreams of the
poets with graceful compositions, formed no less of imaginary beings
than of real personages; and, for a long period, the Virtues and the
Graces equally presided over the painter’s study.
But it was natural that, in the great diversity of tastes, some should
seek after the mere ornament that the arts could furnish. Hence the
minor walks of painting began to be cultivated apart from the greater.
And something was found to gratify every spectator in the various
departments of this enchanting art.
It has been the custom to distribute all the various works of art
into three or four classes, each comprehending a most incongruous
variety[142].
The first place is always allowed to HISTORIC PAINTING, which, as now
understood, means everything that is not portrait, or domestic scenery,
or landscape, or flowers, or caricature, from the Last Judgment of
Michael Angelo, down to a sleeping nymph, or a weeping Magdalene[143].
PORTRAIT comes next, and even those who have seen Giulio II. are not
ashamed to place in the same class, the _Lord Henrys_ and _Lady Janes_,
Les _Barons de T._, or Les _Comtesses de V._, that annually adorn the
walls of the London and Paris exhibitions.
With the FAMILIAR LIFE class, as now understood, I do not quarrel;
if the Dutch and Flemings, two centuries ago, far exceeded all we do
in execution, we moderns are much above them in sense and feeling;
in having a story to tell and telling it well. Besides, the words
_familiar life_ admit at once every variety of subject, from genteel
comedy to broad farce. It appears to have been cultivated with some
success by the ancients.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account