Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems: Authorised TranslationWeismann, August
Science
Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems: Authorised Translation
Weismann, August
Evolution (Biology); Genetics; Reproduction
Professor Meldola points out to me that Darwin did not admit that
Galton’s experiments disproved pangenesis (‘Nature,’ April 27, 1871,
p. 502), and Galton also admitted this in the next number of ‘Nature’
(May 4, 1871, p. 5).—A. W. 1889.
Footnote 99:
Weismann, ‘Ueber die Vererbung.’ Jena, 1883; translated in the
present volume as the second essay ‘On Heredity.’
Footnote 100:
E. Roth, ‘Die Thatsachen der Vererbung.’ 2. Aufl., Berlin, 1885, p.
14.
Footnote 101:
Jäger, ‘Lehrbuch der allgemeinen Zoologie,’ Bd. II. Leipzig, 1878.
Footnote 102:
M. Nussbaum, ‘Die Differenzirung des Geschlechts im Thierreich,’
Arch. f. Mikrosk. Anat., Bd. XVIII. 1880.
Footnote 103:
I have since learnt that Professor Rauber of Dorpat also expressed
similar views in 1880; and Professor Herdman of Liverpool informs me
that Mr. Francis Galton had brought forward in 1876 a theory of
heredity of which the fundamental idea in some ways approached that
of the continuity of the germ-plasm (‘Journal of the Anthropological
Institute,’ vol. v; London, 1876).—A. W., 1888.
[A less complete theory was brought forward by Galton at an earlier
date, in 1872 (see Proc. Roy. Soc. No. 136, p. 394). In this paper he
proposed the idea that heredity chiefly depends upon the development
of the offspring from elements directly derived from the fertilized
ovum which had produced the parent. Galton speaks of the fact that
‘each individual may properly be conceived as consisting of two
parts, one of which is latent and only known to us by its effects on
his posterity, while the other is patent, and constitutes the person
manifest to our senses. The adjacent and, in a broad sense, separate
lines of growth in which the patent and latent elements are situated,
diverge from a common group and converge to a common contribution,
because they were both evolved out of elements contained in a
structureless ovum, and they, jointly, contribute the elements which
form the structureless ova of their offspring.’ The following diagram
shows clearly ‘that the span of each of the links in the general
chain of heredity extends from one structureless stage to another,
and not from person to person:—
Structureless elements {...Adult Father... } structureless elements
in Father {...Latent in Father...} in Offspring.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account