Essays Upon Some Controverted QuestionsHuxley, Thomas Henry
Religion
Essays Upon Some Controverted Questions
Huxley, Thomas Henry
Science
One day she went, with the deepest affliction, to the house of Mo-oonga
Toobó, the widow of the deceased chief, to communicate what had
happened to her at the _fytoca_ [grave] during several nights, and
which caused her the greatest anxiety. She related that she had dreamed
that the late How [king] appeared to her and, with a countenance full
of disappointment, asked why there yet remained at Vavaoo so many
evil-designing persons: for he declared that, since he had been at
Bolotoo, his spirit had been disturbed[47] by the evil machinations of
wicked men conspiring against his son; but he declared that "the youth"
should not be molested nor his power shaken by the spirit of rebellion;
that he therefore came to her with a warning voice to prevent such
disastrous consequences (vol. i. p. 424).
On inquiry it turned out that the charm of _tattao_ had been performed on
Finow's grave, with the view {181} of injuring his son, the reigning king,
and it is to be presumed that it was this sorcerer's work which had
"disturbed" Finow's spirit. The Rev. Richard Taylor says in the work
already cited: "The account given of the witch of Endor agrees most
remarkably with the witches of New Zealand" (p. 45).
The Tongans also believed in a mode of divination (essentially similar to
the casting of lots) by the twirling of a cocoa-nut.
The object of inquiry ... is chiefly whether a sick person will
recover; for this purpose the nut being placed on the ground, a
relation of the sick person determines that, if the nut, when again at
rest, points to such a quarter, the east for example, that the sick man
will recover; he then prays aloud to the patron god of the family that
he will be pleased to direct the nut so that it may indicate the truth;
the nut being next spun, the result is attended to with confidence, at
least with a full conviction that it will truly declare the intentions
of the gods at the time (vol. ii. p. 227).
Does not the action of Saul, on a famous occasion, involve exactly the same
theological presuppositions?
Therefore Saul said unto Jahveh, the Elohim of Israel, Shew the right.
And Jonathan and Saul were taken _by lot_: but the people escaped. And
Saul said, Cast _lots_ between me and Jonathan my son. And Jonathan was
taken. And Saul said to Jonathan, Tell me what thou hast done.... And
the people rescued Jonathan so that he died not (1 Sam. xiv. 41-45).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account