Essays Upon Some Controverted QuestionsHuxley, Thomas Henry
Religion
Essays Upon Some Controverted Questions
Huxley, Thomas Henry
Science
Having taken a good deal of trouble to show what Genesis i.-ii. 4 does
not mean, in the preceding pages, perhaps it may be well that I should
briefly give my opinion as to what it does mean. I conceive that the
unknown author of this part of the Hexateuchal compilation believed,
and meant his readers to believe, that his words, as they understood
them--that is to say, in their ordinary natural sense--conveyed the
"actual historical truth." When he says that such and such things
happened, I believe him to mean that they actually occurred and not
that he imagined or dreamed them; when he says "day," I believe he uses
the word in the popular sense; when he says "made" or "created," I
believe he means that they came into being by a process analogous to
that which the people whom he addressed called "making" or "creating";
and I think that, unless we forget our present knowledge of nature,
and, putting ourselves back into the position of a Phoenician or a
Chaldæan philosopher, start from his conception of the world, we shall
fail to grasp the meaning of the Hebrew writer. We must conceive the
earth to be an immovable, more or less flattened, body, with the vault
of heaven above, the watery abyss below and around. We must imagine
sun, moon, and stars to be "set" in a "firmament" with, or in, which
they move; and above which is yet another watery mass. We must consider
"light" and "darkness" to be things, the alternation of which
constitutes day and night, independently of the existence of sun, moon,
and stars. We must further suppose that, as in the case of the story of
the deluge, the Hebrew writer was acquainted with a Gentile (probably
Chaldæan or Accadian) account of the origin of things, in which he
substantially believed, but which he stripped of all its idolatrous
associations by substituting "Elohim" for Ea, Anu, Bel, and the like.
From this point of view the first verse strikes the keynote of the
whole. In the beginning "Elohim[24] created the heaven and the earth."
Heaven and earth were not primitive existences from which the gods
proceeded, as the Gentiles taught; on the contrary, the "Powers"
preceded and created heaven and earth. {128} Whether by "creation" is
meant "causing to be where nothing was before" or "shaping of something
which pre-existed," seems to me to be an insoluble question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account