Essays Upon Some Controverted QuestionsHuxley, Thomas Henry
Religion
Essays Upon Some Controverted Questions
Huxley, Thomas Henry
Science
These were provided by the fourth day's work. Light existed already;
but now vehicles for the distribution of light, in a special manner and
with varying degrees of intensity, were provided. I conceive that the
previous alternations of light and darkness were supposed to go on; but
that the "light" was {129} strengthened during the daytime by the sun,
which, as a source of heat as well as of light, glided up the firmament
from the east, and slid down in the west, each day. Very probably each
day's sun was supposed to be a new one. And, as the light of the day
was strengthened by the sun, so the darkness of the night was weakened
by the moon, which regularly waxed and waned every month. The stars
are, as it were, thrown in. And nothing can more sharply mark the
doctrinal purpose of the author, than the manner in which he deals with
the heavenly bodies, which the Gentiles identified so closely with
their gods, as if they were mere accessories to the almanac.
Animals come next in order of creation, and the general notion of the
writer seems to be that they were produced by the medium in which they
live; that is to say, the aquatic animals by the waters and the
terrestrial animals by the land. But there was a difficulty about
flying things, such as bats, birds, and insects. The cosmogonist seems
to have had no conception of "air" as an elemental body. His "elements"
are earth and water, and he ignores air as much as he does fire. Birds
"fly above the earth in the open firmament" or "on the face of the
expanse" of heaven. They are not said to fly through the air. The
choice of a generative medium for flying things, therefore, seemed to
lie between water and earth; and, if we take into account the
conspicuousness of the great flocks of water-birds and the swarms of
winged insects, which appear to arise from water, I think the
preference of water becomes intelligible. However, I do not put this
forward as more than a probable hypothesis. As to the creation of
aquatic animals on the fifth, that of land animals on the sixth day,
and that of man last of all, I presume the order was determined by the
fact that man could hardly receive dominion over the living world
before it existed; and that the "cattle" were not wanted until he was
about to make his appearance. The other terrestrial animals would
naturally be associated with the cattle.
The absurdity of imagining that any conception, analogous to that of a
zoological classification, was in the mind of the writer will be
apparent, when we consider that the fifth day's work must include the
zoologist's _Cetacea_, _Sirenia_, and seals,[25] all of which are {130}
_Mammalia_; all birds, turtles, sea-snakes and, presumably, the fresh
water _Reptilia_ and _Amphibia_; with the great majority of
_Invertebrata_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account