Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921Graham, Stephen
History
Europe—whither bound? (Quo vadis Europa?) : $b being letters of travel from the capitals of Europe in the year 1921
Graham, Stephen
Europe -- Description and travel
Undoubtedly, external policy has helped Italy greatly. Whilst France
and England have played a fitfully obstructionist and generally
uninspired policy towards the restoration of European trade, Italy has
been steadily working in a positive direction. She has received
substantial help from Germany, help in return for help. The wasteful
process of using Switzerland as a fence for German goods has largely
been abandoned in favour of a direct commercial exchange. Italian
shipping, augmented by its Austrian spoils, has obtained considerable
help and advice. Quite surprising how many Germans have posts in the
Italian shipping companies! Germany has lost her own ships, but she
has a large business executive in the background, the administrative
organization of what was once a great mercantile marine. She has still
a preponderant power in allocating business. The Italian benefit and
the success of Italy's new policy have been reflected in the phenomenal
appreciation of the lira which during the spring of 1921 actually
gained 33 1/2 per cent in value, mounting from 110 to the pound
sterling in January to 73 in May. Such a rise in the value of the
currency naturally helps Italian industry, facilitating the import of
raw materials and coal and oil. In the summer of 1921 Italy became
glutted with coal.
Such progress is not good news in Moscow. The chief external hope of
Moscow must for long have been in Italy. And conversely the chief hope
of the Socialists in Italy must have been in the progress of Moscow's
international ideal. Not that the proletarian leaders of comfortable
Italy realized what they were advocating. They are not such idealists
in Italy as to be ready to commit national suicide for the good of
humanity as a whole, or even for the good of humanity as a class, as a
working class. But, be that as it may, the moral authority waned when
the Russo-British trading treaty was signed. Krassin killed the Third
Internationale. You do not trade with a capitalistic State in order to
destroy it. Moscow began to set up a new bourgeois class, started
shops again, and banks and private trading, and generally speaking,
having buried the devil, dug him up again.
With that, Moscow ceased to inspire the grand international solidarity
of proletariats. There was a set-back in wages over the whole world.
At the same time the strike-weapon tended to fail. May Day, 1921, was
one of the quietest of May Days. In Paris it was a joyous holiday; in
Berlin, though the jewellers ordered new steel screens for their goods,
not a window was broken; in London the gloomy coal strike pursued its
lonely road towards defeat, unsupported by even its own allies of
transport and railroad, far less by an ideal from Moscow. And
bourgeois Western Europe--and Italy not least--breathed afresh.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account