Eustace Marchmont: A friend of the peopleEverett-Green, Evelyn
General
Eustace Marchmont: A friend of the people
Everett-Green, Evelyn
West Country (England) -- Fiction
“Papa,” she said, “I do not think it is Eustace’s Radical views which
repel me, except in so far as they are bound up in those which to me
are both sinful and sad. I know that he has the welfare of this land
and its people as much at heart as you; that he loves his country and
the poor in it as we love them; that he wishes to raise and teach and
make them better and happier. I know he would spend his life and his
fortune in the cause and grudge it nothing if good could be done. There
is a great deal that I admire and love in Eustace; but, ah! I cannot
divide into two distinct parts his political views and those other
views of his which are so integral a part of his character. To me they
seem interlocked at every point, and therefore at every point I see
something which repels me--something which I shrink from--something
which seems to me untrue and evil in essence, even though on the
surface so much may be said for it. I do not know if you understand
me. Sometimes I scarcely understand myself--hardly know how to put my
thoughts into words; but they are there, always with me; and the more I
think, the less I can feel that the two things can ever be altogether
divided.”
“What two things?” asked the Duke. “I do not think I follow you.”
“I mean, papa, the spiritual and the intellectual side of our nature.
You know we have a threefold nature--body, soul, and spirit; but yet it
is all one, and I think people make a great mistake when they seek to
try and divide the physical and the intellectual from the spiritual.
Eustace does--in practice, if not in theory. He wishes to gain for the
poor an improved condition of bodily comfort, and I am sure this is
a kindly and a right wish. He has told me things that make my blood
curdle about the awful misery and want reigning in many places. He
wants to raise men intellectually, to think for themselves, to learn
many things which will help in their advancement, to strive after a
better standard, and to be disgusted at their present ignorance and
degradation. But having done that, he stops short. He has no wish to
quicken in their spirits the love of God, which would purify these
other desires and hold in check the baser passions they so often
arouse without that curb. Of their spirits he takes no heed--how should
he, when he does not even admit that there is an inner and spiritual
life--when he is content to remain in ignorance of everything beyond
the limits of his own understanding, and to assert that nothing can
be positively taught as truth which cannot be proved by the finite
intellect of man? I may not put his case quite justly, because he does
not speak of these things openly to me. He tries to pass them over in
vague words, and keep the talk to ‘practical matters.’ But I have heard
enough to know what he does think--to know that he has no faith in the
Crucified Saviour--in an Incarnate God--in a Sanctifying Spirit; and
without that faith, how can he hope to lead men aright? Ah! he will
never do it!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account